2011/10/12 Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:53:34 +0800 dave jones wrote:
>
> dj> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, dave jones wrote:
> >> 2011/10/4 Mikolaj Golub :
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
> >>>
> >>> dj> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 09:53:34 +0800 dave jones wrote:
dj> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, dave jones wrote:
>> 2011/10/4 Mikolaj Golub :
>>>
>>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
>>>
>>> dj> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, 2
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:12 AM, dave jones wrote:
> 2011/10/4 Mikolaj Golub :
>>
>> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
>>
>> dj> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:
2011/10/4 Mikolaj Golub :
>
> On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
>
> dj> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
> >>
> >> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
> >>>
> >>> KM> Sorry, didn't look
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011 14:15:45 +0800 dave jones wrote:
dj> On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
>>>
>>> KM> Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen someth
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
>>
>> KM> Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen something KM>
>> like this before in timewait. This "can't happen" with UDP s
On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Mikolaj Golub wrote:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
KM> Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen something KM>
like this before in timewait. This "can't happen" with UDP so will be KM>
interested in learning more about the bug.
The pa
On 30 September 2011 09:04, dave jones wrote:
> What are you waiting for? The issue is reproducible. If you're running
> FreeBSD 9 with Mikolaj's test_udp program, you'll get the kernel panic.
> I think sysadmins won't be happy about this...
Well, the people familiar with the network stack need
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. so now there's a patch:
>
> * is there a PR for this?
> * if there is, can we get this patch and the discussion about this bug
> placed in the PR? :)
>
> That way it doesn't get lost. No, I lie. It doesn't get "too lost". :-)
What are you
.. so now there's a patch:
* is there a PR for this?
* if there is, can we get this patch and the discussion about this bug
placed in the PR? :)
That way it doesn't get lost. No, I lie. It doesn't get "too lost". :-)
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.or
2011/9/29 Mikolaj Golub :
>
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
>
> KM> Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen something
> KM> like this before in timewait. This "can't happen" with UDP so will be
> KM> interested in learning more about the bug.
>
> The panic ca
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 16:12:55 +0200 K. Macy wrote:
KM> Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen something
KM> like this before in timewait. This "can't happen" with UDP so will be
KM> interested in learning more about the bug.
The panic can be easily triggered by this:
test_
Can someone please help dave out with the mini dump script stuff that's in 9?
That way he can get a crash dump and back trace, all happily wrapped
up in a text file?
That's likely going to help the relevant developers :-)
Adrian
___
freebsd-net@freebs
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:51 PM, dave jones wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM,
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 8:51 PM, dave jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, dave jones wrote:
Hi,
I have two production machines runn
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, dave jones wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have two production machines running on freebsd 9.0-beta2 and both got
>>> kernel panic related to n
Sorry, didn't look at the images (limited bw), I've seen something
like this before in timewait. This "can't happen" with UDP so will be
interested in learning more about the bug.
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 4:02 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:12 AM, K. Macy wrote:
>>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 5:12 AM, K. Macy wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, September 26, 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 26 September 2011 13:41, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>>> /*
>>> * XXX
>>> * This entire block sorely needs a rewrite.
>>> */
>>> if (t &&
>>> ((t->inp_flags & IN
On Monday, September 26, 2011, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 26 September 2011 13:41, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> /*
>> * XXX
>> * This entire block sorely needs a rewrite.
>> */
>>if (t &&
>>((t->inp_flags & INP_TIMEWAIT) == 0) &&
>>(so->so_type != SOCK_STREAM ||
>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:45 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 26 September 2011 13:41, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> /*
>> * XXX
>> * This entire block sorely needs a rewrite.
>> */
>> if (t &&
>> ((t->inp_flags & INP_TIMEWAIT) == 0) &&
>> (so->so_type != SOCK_STRE
On 26 September 2011 13:41, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> /*
> * XXX
> * This entire block sorely needs a rewrite.
> */
> if (t &&
> ((t->inp_flags & INP_TIMEWAIT) == 0) &&
> (so->so_type != SOCK_STREAM ||
> ntohl(t->inp_faddr.s_addr) == INADDR_ANY) &&
>
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, dave jones wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have two production machines running on freebsd 9.0-beta2 and both got
>> kernel panic related to networking. Any idea how to solve it? thanks.
>>
>> http://http:/
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:43 AM, dave jones wrote:
> Hi,
> I have two production machines running on freebsd 9.0-beta2 and both got
> kernel panic related to networking. Any idea how to solve it? thanks.
>
> http://http://60.248.161.9/p1.jpg
> http://http://60.248.161.9/p2.jpg
>
this host is
23 matches
Mail list logo