Rob,
to compile the driver taken from RELENG_6 branch on the
6.0-RELEASE (or 6.1-RELEASE) system you need to also merge
this commit into your system:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2006-July/065867.html
After this driver from RELENG_6 will be buildable. I wonder, why
noone in t
On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jack Vogel wrote:
On 9/1/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This was my earlier point Rob, that delta of the driver WILL NOT
build against 6.1 RELEASE, it has taskqueue changes in it that
are not in the release, as well as a few other small gotchas.
To get that fix you
On 9/1/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Joe Holden wrote:
>>> Sounds like its at least possible this is your problem, worth setting up a
>>> system to test with I would say.
> There's also another possibility these days -- we support errata fixes
going
> into rele
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Joe Holden wrote:
Sounds like its at least possible this is your problem, worth setting up a
system to test with I would say.
There's also another possibility these days -- we support errata fixes
going
into release branches, as we do with security fixes. These change
This bug should be fixed with cvs rev. 1.129
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Watt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 8:15 PM
Subject: Intel em receive hang and possible pr #72970
> Hi,
>
> We have experienced a very sporadic problem on 2 amd64 machines running
> F
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Joe Holden wrote:
Does it seem that we are encountering that bug? Is that bug fixed in
6.1-RELEASE, or is there an easy patch to 6.0-RELEASE (i.e. can we only
patch the em driver).
That fix is only just into the STABLE code, so no, not in 6.1-RELEASE. You
could take the
Jack Vogel wrote:
> As a matter of fact I dont believe the STABLE tip will even build on
> RELEASE (something that I take issue with).
The latest RELENG_N version of the source definitely SHOULD build on a
-RELEASE version of that same branch, so if you've tried this and it doesn't
work, please r
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:38:40PM -0700, Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 8/31/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >After poking around in various group/pr postings the most similar problem
> >that we found was PR #72970.
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72970
> >
> >Does it seem tha
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 8/31/06, Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 8/31/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> After poking around in various group/pr postings the most similar
problem
>> that we found was PR #72970.
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr
On 8/31/06, Joe Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jack Vogel wrote:
> On 8/31/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> After poking around in various group/pr postings the most similar problem
>> that we found was PR #72970.
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72970
>>
>> Does it
Jack Vogel wrote:
On 8/31/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After poking around in various group/pr postings the most similar problem
that we found was PR #72970.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72970
Does it seem that we are encountering that bug? Is that bug fixed in
6.1-R
On 8/31/06, Rob Watt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After poking around in various group/pr postings the most similar problem
that we found was PR #72970.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72970
Does it seem that we are encountering that bug? Is that bug fixed in
6.1-RELEASE, or is there
12 matches
Mail list logo
