Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread Andre Oppermann
Petri Helenius wrote: > > ming fu wrote: > > > Does this one replace the em driver? > > > > > It does not. However as far as I understand the semantics of the chips > aren´t that much different so I wonder why another driver instead of > adding to em. >From reading both drivers it seems the 10Gb

Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread Petri Helenius
ming fu wrote: Does this one replace the em driver? It does not. However as far as I understand the semantics of the chips aren´t that much different so I wonder why another driver instead of adding to em. Pete ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http:

Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread Robert Watson
On Thu, 17 Jun 2004, Tony Ackerman wrote: > We have commited the ixgb(4) driver for Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Server > Adapters to -current and -stable. Tony, When I took a look at the ixgb driver a couple of weeks ago, it looked like there was currently no locking in the driver to allow it to execut

Re: Intel 10GbE Driver committed

2004-06-17 Thread ming fu
Does this one replace the em driver? Tony Ackerman wrote: We have commited the ixgb(4) driver for Intel(R) PRO/10GbE Server Adapters to -current and -stable. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsu