At Thu, 14 May 2009 14:42:35 -0700,
"Kevin Oberman" wrote:
> I then captured the ICMP and discovered that the kernel was fragmenting
> all of them! Worse, the fragment was sent out before the ICMP! What the
> heck is going on! Thread synchronization?
>
> When I captured the packets (via tcpdump
Steve Bertrand wrote:
> Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>> Second, why the heck is the fragment going out first? This should be OK,
>> but I suspect many firewalls (which are often not happy with fragments)
>> are not likely to pass a fragment which precedes the initial frame.
>
> I'll try to find some ti
Kevin Oberman wrote:
> Second, why the heck is the fragment going out first? This should be OK,
> but I suspect many firewalls (which are often not happy with fragments)
> are not likely to pass a fragment which precedes the initial frame.
I'll try to find some time today to see if I can replicat
On Thu, 14 May 2009, Kevin Oberman wrote:
Hi,
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:09:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: sth...@nethelp.no
First, why is the kernel fragmenting this at all as it fits in the
interface MTU?
Good question, I definitely disagree with this behavior and would say
that it breaks POLA. But
> Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 00:09:02 +0200 (CEST)
> From: sth...@nethelp.no
>
> > First, why is the kernel fragmenting this at all as it fits in the
> > interface MTU?
>
> Good question, I definitely disagree with this behavior and would say
> that it breaks POLA. But it's documented (see the ping6
> First, why is the kernel fragmenting this at all as it fits in the
> interface MTU?
Good question, I definitely disagree with this behavior and would say
that it breaks POLA. But it's documented (see the ping6 -m option).
> Can anyone fetch anything from ftp.funet.fi via IPv6? I suspect it is
>
