Luigi Rizzo writes:
| On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:39:45PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| ...
| > Various drivers have code to deal with this when the structure
| > it is putting the frags into runs out :-( See a recent bug fix to
| > the ste(4) gleaned from the fxp(4). This type of problem is prob
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 12:39:45PM -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
...
> Various drivers have code to deal with this when the structure
> it is putting the frags into runs out :-( See a recent bug fix to
> the ste(4) gleaned from the fxp(4). This type of problem is probably
> lurking in other driver
Luigi Rizzo writes:
| On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 04:15:56PM -0700, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
| > Sorry for the cross-posting.
| >
| >
| > All,
| >
| > Is there a pre-set limit on maximum number of fragments in a
| > mbuf chain ?
| >
| > I see 64 fragments with jumbofra
On Tue, Sep 24, 2002 at 04:15:56PM -0700, Prafulla Deuskar wrote:
> Sorry for the cross-posting.
>
>
> All,
>
> Is there a pre-set limit on maximum number of fragments in a
> mbuf chain ?
>
> I see 64 fragments with jumboframes (mtu 9000) using nttcp.
aha... (thi
