>> if you are using dynamic IP address assigned from upstream provider,
>> maybe try to talk with freenet6 guys so that they'd give you
>> subnets...
>Don't your ISP assign prefix using DTCP (Dynamic Tunnel Configuration
>Protocol)? I believe IIJ is good location. ;-)
I gu
> On Fri, 02 Mar 2001 20:47:54 +0900
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
itojun> if you are using dynamic IP address assigned from upstream provider,
itojun> maybe try to talk with freenet6 guys so that they'd give you
itojun> subnets...
Don't your ISP assign prefix using D
< said:
> I really need to get myself up to date on IPv6, but is it still possible
> to do NAT like stuff with IPv6 though?
It should not be necessary. 6to4 provides a convenient alternative
that's available to anyone with an IPv4 address. One problem is the
lack of reverse-mapping support in
>I really need to get myself up to date on IPv6, but is it still possible
>to do NAT like stuff with IPv6 though?
you shouldn't need to. this is just a freenet6's restriction that
it does not give you subnets instead of /128 host address.
if you have a permanent IPv4 add
-On [20010301 17:24], Hajimu UMEMOTO ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> On 27 Feb 2001 13:53:39 -0600
>> Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>kirk> I want this machine to be a IPv6 gateway for the other machines
>kirk> on my LAN, too.
>
>Since Freenet6 serve only one host address, it is imp
At 2001-03-01T16:13:02Z, Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Though I have never try Freenet6, it should work:
Thanks for the assistance. I'm not yet at the point where I
know enough about the subject to learn on my own.
> kirk> I want this machine to be a IPv6 gateway for the other
> On 27 Feb 2001 13:53:39 -0600
> Kirk Strauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kirk> I registered for an IPv6 tunnel from www.freenet6.net, and they
kirk> send me the following Perl script (modified to work behind a NAT
kirk> router according to the "IPv6-behind-NAT" instructions at
kirk> http