On Tue, 7/16/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Tuesday, July 16, 2013, 1:10 AM
On 15.07.2013 22:04, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
> Also, IP frag
On 15.07.2013 22:04, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> Also, IP fragmentation and TCP segments are not the same thing. TCP
> segments regularly will come in out of order, NFS is too stupid to do
> things correctly; IP fragmentation should not be done unless necessary
> to accommodate a smaller mtu.
The PR
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "isp"
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
>
On Sun, 7/14/13, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Subject: Re: FreeBSD router problems
To: "Barney Cordoba"
Cc: "isp" , freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Date: Sunday, July 14, 2013, 1:17 PM
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba
wrote:
>
On 14.07.2013 23:14, Barney Cordoba wrote:
> So why not get a real 10gb/s card? RJ45 10gig is here,
> and it works a lot better than LAGG.
>
> If you want to get more than 1Gb/s on a single connection,
> you'd need to use roundrobin, which will alternate packets
> without concern for ordering. Pu
How are you benchmarking it? Each TCP connection only uses one member
of a lagg port. So if you want to see > 1 Gbps, you'll need to
benchmark with multiple TCP connections. You may also need multiple
systems; I don't know the full details of LACP.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:32 AM, isp wrote:
