Hi,
Thanks a lot to all those who replied on and off the list! The
winner is Andrew R. Reiter . Here is a
possible solution to the problem, inspired by his response:
ifconfig fxp1 fxp1_IP netmask 255.255.255.255
ifconfig fxp2 fxp2_IP netmask 255.255.255.255
route
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:25:33PM -0500, Nick Rogness wrote:
> >
[SNIP]
> >
> > AFAIK, the route to get from 1 interface to the other is not
> > through the lo0. I'm not sure if the kernel sends these packets
> > across lo0 (internally) or not. Bu
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:25:33PM -0500, Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
> >> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:57:44PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
> >>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wro
>On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Crist J. Clark wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:57:44PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
>>> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>>>
>>> You MIGHT be able to use ipfw divert/pipe rules to somehow sh
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 01:57:44PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
> > Nick Rogness, and lo! it spake thus:
> > > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > - Is it
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Nick Rogness wrote:
> I had a brief thought of using an upstream device that could route
> the appropriate nat'd addresses to each interface.
This is not an option, unfortunately. The required functionality has
to be implemented inside one PC (appliance). No exter
On Sat, 6 Apr 2002, Nick Rogness wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
> > Nick Rogness, and lo! it spake thus:
[missing stuff]
I missed the original mailling..
what was the requirement?
To Unsubscribe: sen
Barney Wolff wrote:
>
> Think about using vmware?
along the same line, but without any outside software : from my
experience, I'm sure you can do it with jail(8) with the creation of two
jails, one NIC per jail and one sender/emitter in each jail.
(there are lots of papers on how to setup a jai
Think about using vmware?
--
Barney Wolff
I never met a computer I didn't like.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
> Nick Rogness, and lo! it spake thus:
> > On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> > >
> > > - Is it possible without kernel modifications? How?
> >
> > AFAIK, No. Your only 2 p
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 06:48:09PM -0600 I heard the voice of
Nick Rogness, and lo! it spake thus:
> On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> >
> > - Is it possible without kernel modifications? How?
>
> AFAIK, No. Your only 2 possiblities that I could think of would
> be to us
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Alex Rousskov wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have two Ethernet NICs inside a PC. I want TCP/IP packets to
> leave one NIC, go on the wire, and eventually arrive at the other NIC.
> I do not want the kernel to be smart and shortcut the path. I want the
> outside world to see t
12 matches
Mail list logo
