On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:44:15AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Igor Sysoev wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:33:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
>
>
> >>I was thinking that it might be possible to tag a socket to accept the
> >>fib of the packet coming in, but if we do this, we sho
Julian Elischer wrote:
Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:33:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I was thinking that it might be possible to tag a socket to accept
the fib of the packet coming in, but if we do this, we should decide
API to label a socket in this way..
I think i
Igor Sysoev wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:33:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
I was thinking that it might be possible to tag a socket to accept the
fib of the packet coming in, but if we do this, we should decide
API to label a socket in this way..
I think it should be sysctl to gl
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 08:33:09AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Igor Sysoev wrote:
> >Julian, thank you for FIB. I have tried in on FreeBSD-7.
> >
> >I've found that ipfw does not know about setfib:
> >ipfw: invalid action setfib
> >
>
> Oh I have not finished MFC..
> will finish today..
>
>
Igor Sysoev wrote:
Julian, thank you for FIB. I have tried in on FreeBSD-7.
I've found that ipfw does not know about setfib:
ipfw: invalid action setfib
Oh I have not finished MFC..
will finish today..
the svn server crashed last night .. :-/
(or at least went very strange) while I was worki
