Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Would this also be a problem that could occur using quagga with zebra
and ospfd?
Sure, if they use routing sockets.
Of course, they are do.
then the answer is yes :-)
___
freebsd-net@freebs
Julian Elischer wrote:
Would this also be a problem that could occur using quagga with zebra
and ospfd?
Sure, if they use routing sockets.
Of course, they are do.
--
Dixi.
Sem.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
Stephen Clark wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Maxime Henrion wrote:
It appears that this patch fixed the problem. My gateway server
now has a nearly two days uptime, whereas previously it would have
probably crashed already. I'm attaching the final version of the
patch here, since the last o
Julian Elischer wrote:
Maxime Henrion wrote:
It appears that this patch fixed the problem. My gateway server
now has a nearly two days uptime, whereas previously it would have
probably crashed already. I'm attaching the final version of the
patch here, since the last one had build-time erro
Maxime Henrion wrote:
It appears that this patch fixed the problem. My gateway server
now has a nearly two days uptime, whereas previously it would have
probably crashed already. I'm attaching the final version of the
patch here, since the last one had build-time errors. I'm going
to commit
Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> > >On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > >J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > >J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
> > >J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what p
Maxime Henrion wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
J> > holdin
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> >J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
> >J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
> >J> > holding the loc
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
J> > holding the lock of the rtentry that the routed proce
Stephen Clark wrote:
> Maxime Henrion wrote:
>
> >Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
> >
> >I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
> >holding the lock of the rtentry that the routed process is dealing
> >with in rt_setgate(), and I just could verify that
Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
> J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
> J> > holding the lock of the rtentry that the rout
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 10:33:25AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
J> Maxime Henrion wrote:
J> > Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
J> > I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
J> > holding the lock of the rtentry that the routed process is dealing
J> > with
Maxime Henrion wrote:
Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
holding the lock of the rtentry that the routed process is dealing
with in rt_setgate(), and I just could verify that it is held by
the swi1: net thread.
So
Maxime Henrion wrote:
Replying to myself on this one, sorry about that.
I said in my previous mail that I didn't know yet what process was
holding the lock of the rtentry that the routed process is dealing
with in rt_setgate(), and I just could verify that it is held by
the swi1: net thread.
S
14 matches
Mail list logo
