Hi Lawrence,
Thank you so much for your response. I discuss KPI changes with Hiren
over a month and understood your idea.
The main point in your discussion thread was the KPI changes in
cc_module. So, I describe about it as follows. As you mention, the
changes in my implemtation is DCTCP spe
Hi Midori (& Lars),
On 03/31/14 16:37, Midori Kato wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD developpers,
>
> I'm Midori Kato. I'm working on the DCTCP implementation in the FreeBSD
> with Lars Eggert. I mail you because I would like to ask you a code
> review and testing. The attached patch is not good enough to test
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:27 AM, Midori Kato wrote:
> Hi Hiren,
>
> Yes, I intentionally replace the location of DELAY_ACK() macro.
> A DCTCP receiver sends an immediate ACK when incoming packets sets CE and
> non-CE bit by turns. To implement this processing, I prepare the
> cc_ecnpkt_handler() fu
Hi Hiren,
Yes, I intentionally replace the location of DELAY_ACK() macro.
A DCTCP receiver sends an immediate ACK when incoming packets sets CE
and non-CE bit by turns. To implement this processing, I prepare the
cc_ecnpkt_handler() function. This function calls the DEKAY_ACK() macro
to check
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Midori Kato wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD developpers,
>
> I'm Midori Kato. I'm working on the DCTCP implementation in the FreeBSD with
> Lars Eggert. I mail you because I would like to ask you a code review and
> testing. The attached patch is not good enough to test our c
Hi,
On 2014-3-31, at 7:37, Midori Kato wrote:
> I will send an ECN marking implmenetation in dummynet and test scripts
> personally to you.
I think you can send the dummynet ECN patch also to the list. I know Luigi is
reviewing it for a merge, but that lets people play with it already.
Lars
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Midori Kato wrote:
> Hi FreeBSD developpers,
>
> I'm Midori Kato. I'm working on the DCTCP implementation in the FreeBSD with
> Lars Eggert. I mail you because I would like to ask you a code review and
> testing. The attached patch is not good enough to test our c