Re: Confused tcpdump

2009-09-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Michael Proto writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > > 15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs] > > 15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup > > [|nfs] > > > > I'm pretty sure 871009576 is not a valid port number... > I've noti

Re: Confused tcpdump

2009-09-24 Thread Michael Proto
2009/9/24 Dag-Erling Smørgrav : > 15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs] > 15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup > [|nfs] > > I'm pretty sure 871009576 is not a valid port number... > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@d

Re: Confused tcpdump

2009-09-24 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <86d45g4ffl@ds4.des.no>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= wr ites: >15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs] >15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup= > [|nfs] > >I'm pretty sure 871009576 is not a valid port nu

Re: Confused tcpdump

2009-09-24 Thread pluknet
2009/9/24 Poul-Henning Kamp : > In message <86d45g4ffl@ds4.des.no>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= > wr > ites: >>15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs] >>15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup= >> [|nfs] >> >>I'm pr