Michael Proto writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > 15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs]
> > 15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup
> > [|nfs]
> >
> > I'm pretty sure 871009576 is not a valid port number...
> I've noti
2009/9/24 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
> 15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs]
> 15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup
> [|nfs]
>
> I'm pretty sure 871009576 is not a valid port number...
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@d
In message <86d45g4ffl@ds4.des.no>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= wr
ites:
>15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs]
>15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup=
> [|nfs]
>
>I'm pretty sure 871009576 is not a valid port nu
2009/9/24 Poul-Henning Kamp :
> In message <86d45g4ffl@ds4.des.no>, =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?=
> wr
> ites:
>>15:50:42.622040 IP 10.0.0.10.871009576 > 10.0.0.4.2049: 192 lookup [|nfs]
>>15:50:42.622386 IP 10.0.0.4.2049 > 10.0.0.10.871009576: reply ok 236 lookup=
>> [|nfs]
>>
>>I'm pr