Re: CFT: 11n support for iwn(4)

2011-05-02 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Monday, May 02, 2011 09:34:31 Brandon Gooch wrote: > 2011/5/2 Bernhard Schmidt : > > On Sunday, May 01, 2011 23:36:56 Brandon Gooch wrote: > >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt > >> wrote: > >> > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >>

Re: CFT: 11n support for iwn(4)

2011-05-02 Thread Brandon Gooch
2011/5/2 Bernhard Schmidt : > On Sunday, May 01, 2011 23:36:56 Brandon Gooch wrote: >> On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt >> wrote: >> > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I finally managed to get the 11n bits for iwn(4) sorted out. Well, >>

Re: CFT: 11n support for iwn(4)

2011-05-02 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Sunday, May 01, 2011 23:36:56 Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I finally managed to get the 11n bits for iwn(4) sorted out. Well, > >> there is still an issue somewhere wi

Re: CFT: 11n support for iwn(4)

2011-05-01 Thread Brandon Gooch
On Sun, May 1, 2011 at 8:24 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I finally managed to get the 11n bits for iwn(4) sorted out. Well, >> there is still an issue somewhere with HT40 frame protection or >> TX chain setup on 5000 adapters, re

Re: CFT: 11n support for iwn(4)

2011-05-01 Thread Bernhard Schmidt
On Sunday 01 May 2011 13:19:30 Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > Hi, > > I finally managed to get the 11n bits for iwn(4) sorted out. Well, > there is still an issue somewhere with HT40 frame protection or > TX chain setup on 5000 adapters, resulting in throughput not being > that stable. But overall it s