On 8/22/13 2:20 AM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Will Andrews wrote
in :
wi> * Always add loopback routes for non-zero FIBs, for both IPv4 and
wi> IPv6. Arguably, this could be a policy issue, but it is currently
wi> less-than-trivial to specify (in rc.conf) that a route needs to be
wi> applied to ev
On 8/22/13 5:52 AM, Alan Somers wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Will Andrews wrote:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
wi> * Always add loopback routes for non-zero FIBs, for both IPv4 and
wi> IPv6. Arguably, this could be a policy issue, but it is currently
wi> le
21.08.2013 19:42, Will Andrews wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working to port forward to FreeBSD/head, improvements made to FIB
> handling by my colleagues Alan Somers and Justin Gibbs.
>
> Please review: http://people.freebsd.org/~will/fix-fib-issues.1.diff
>
> This patch includes fixes for several issu
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Alan Somers wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Will Andrews wrote:
>
> When would you ever want lo0 to be inaccessible from some fibs? I can't
> think of any reasons.
>
>
I can't think of a use case either, that is why I mentioned he has my
wheels turning
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 5:28 PM, Will Andrews wrote:
>
> Other places in rc.d/routing can make use of 'all' in that case.
>
> No, loopback host routes are not installed into all FIBs, only FIB 0.
> This is with rt_add_addr_allfibs == 0 (see rtinit1()), which probably
> explains why. We could add
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Will Andrews wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> > wi> * Always add loopback routes for non-zero FIBs, for both IPv4 and
> > wi> IPv6. Arguably, this could be a policy issue, but it is currently
> > wi> less-than-trivial to specify (i
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> wi> * Always add loopback routes for non-zero FIBs, for both IPv4 and
> wi> IPv6. Arguably, this could be a policy issue, but it is currently
> wi> less-than-trivial to specify (in rc.conf) that a route needs to be
> wi> applied to every FIB.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Will Andrews wrote
> in :
>
> wi> Please review: http://people.freebsd.org/~will/fix-fib-issues.1.diff
> wi>
> wi> This patch includes fixes for several issues relating to FIBs:
> wi>
> wi> * Use of dhclient with non-zero FIBs. With this
Will Andrews wrote
in :
wi> Please review: http://people.freebsd.org/~will/fix-fib-issues.1.diff
wi>
wi> This patch includes fixes for several issues relating to FIBs:
wi>
wi> * Use of dhclient with non-zero FIBs. With this patch, it is possible
wi> to use DHCP on a specific interface with a n
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote:
>
> * Use of dhclient with non-zero FIBs. With this patch, it is possible
>
>> to use DHCP on a specific interface with a non-zero FIB and have it
>> work correctly with this rc.conf snippet:
>>
>> ifconfig_em1="SYNCDHCP"
>> dhclient_fib_em
* Use of dhclient with non-zero FIBs. With this patch, it is possible
> to use DHCP on a specific interface with a non-zero FIB and have it
> work correctly with this rc.conf snippet:
>
> ifconfig_em1="SYNCDHCP"
> dhclient_fib_em1=1
>
This patch is needed, I have a situation where we have
2 inte
On 21.08.2013 17:42, Will Andrews wrote:
Hi,
I'm working to port forward to FreeBSD/head, improvements made to FIB
handling by my colleagues Alan Somers and Justin Gibbs.
Please review: http://people.freebsd.org/~will/fix-fib-issues.1.diff
This patch includes fixes for several issues relating
12 matches
Mail list logo
