On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Bruce Simpson wrote:
> I'll have to take your word for that as I'm not using CARP just at the
> moment. I had to touch the mcast setup for the IPv6 SSM implementation. All
> compiles OK, but I haven't tested the code other than loading it. Only IPv6
> multicast gro
Will Andrews wrote:
Thank you very much for your feedback. I have implemented your
suggestion as follows:
http://firepipe.net/patches/carp-as-module-20090503-2.diff
Great stuff. Overall this does make things that much cleaner.
This version doesn't reinvent the wheel as far as registering
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:47 AM, Bruce M. Simpson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Will Andrews wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've written a patch (against 8.0-CURRENT as of r191369) which makes
>> it possible to build, load, run, & unload CARP as a module, using the
>> GENERIC kernel. It can be obtained from:
>>
>>
On 2009.04.21 23:16:58 -0600, Will Andrews wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've written a patch (against 8.0-CURRENT as of r191369) which makes
> it possible to build, load, run, & unload CARP as a module, using the
> GENERIC kernel. It can be obtained from:
>
> http://firepipe.net/patches/carp-as-module-20
Hi,
Will Andrews wrote:
Hello,
I've written a patch (against 8.0-CURRENT as of r191369) which makes
it possible to build, load, run, & unload CARP as a module, using the
GENERIC kernel. It can be obtained from:
http://firepipe.net/patches/carp-as-module-20090421.diff
There's no need to i
Will Andrews wrote:
I'm sure most of this sounds like rambling from a crazed lunatic or
something, but I'm also sure most who understand my patch agree that
it isn't the nicest of ways to make it possible to load carp (or any
other protocol) as a module.
Not at all. It is a mess to be sure.
