On Wednesday 06 December 2006 02:48, Benjamin Adams wrote:
> I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a NAT.
> I'm trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by clients through
> that firewall. I don't have the ability to just put an inline box to
> examine packets. Is ther
Benjamin D Adams wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 16:25 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Benjamin D Adams wrote:
What my network looks like:
NET
|
NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
|
/-[ HUB ]\< put a cheap hub here
On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 16:25 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Benjamin D Adams wrote:
> > What my network looks like:
> > NET
> > |
> > NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
> > |
> > ---< put a cheap hub here
> > | |
Benjamin D Adams wrote:
What my network looks like:
NET
|
NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
|
---< put a cheap hub here
| | |
2.1.24.35 2.1.24.36 2.1.24.37
if you place a cheap 100M
What my network looks like:
NET
|
NAT/FIREWALL(2.1.24.34)
|
---
| | |
2.1.24.35 2.1.24.36 2.1.24.37
There is no DHCP, I don't think it is possablie to do this but I want to
install a
On Dec 6, 2006, at 10:38 AM, Brett Glass wrote:
Is adding a hub or a bridge a topology change? I'd argue that it
wasn't.
Um. Adding a normal client machine to an existing hub or switch does
not constitute a topology change. Adding a new hub or bridge most
certainly would constitute a top
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 11:53, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
> > >> Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets.
> > >> Then, periodically ha
At 10:53 AM 12/6/2006, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>He specifically said in his original post that putting a machine
>between the router and his lan wasn't an option. His question
>was, "Is there a program where I can see whats going on from the
>computer on that network?" The answer to that question
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets.
Then, periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job
and write the
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 10:11, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
> >> Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets.
> >> Then, periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job
> >> and write the resu
Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets. Then,
periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job and
write the results to a file. You can then prepare tables and charts
which are as simple or a
At 02:13 AM 12/6/2006, Josh Paetzel wrote:
>Just curious.but where is he going to run ipfw? I seriously doubt
>his router can run it, and what good is it going to do him to run it
>on a machine on the network if the network is switched? It's not
>going to be able to see any of the traffic
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 23:52, Brett Glass wrote:
> Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets. Then,
> periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job and
> write the results to a file. You can then prepare tables and charts
> which are as simple or as fancy as you
Add a few IPFW "count" rules to count the bytes and packets. Then,
periodically harvest and reset the counters via a cron job and write
the results to a file. You can then prepare tables and charts which
are as simple or as fancy as you please, without resorting to SNMP
(which isn't secure). A l
Benjamin Adams wrote:
> I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a NAT. I'm
> trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by clients through that
> firewall. I don't have the ability to just put an inline box to examine
> packets. Is there a program where I can see whats goi
On Tuesday 05 December 2006 11:45, pete wright wrote:
> On 12/5/06, Benjamin Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a
> > NAT. I'm trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by
> > clients through that firewall. I don't have the ability
On 12/5/06, Benjamin Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm on a network that has a normal store firewall, setup as a NAT. I'm
trying to find a way to monitor all bandwidth by clients through that
firewall. I don't have the ability to just put an inline box to examine
packets. Is there a program
17 matches
Mail list logo
