Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-15 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, If you'd like this kind of userland wifi mesh stuff to show up, we first need someone to step up as net80211 adhoc/injection maintainer. These userland mesh implementations rely on direction injection of wifi frames to work and I believe our support is currently 'tricky'. It also isn't at al

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-15 Thread Ian Smith
On Mon, 14 May 2012 16:02:40 +0300, Ivo Vachkov wrote: > Hello all, > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi > wrote: > > > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: > > >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-14 Thread Monthadar Al Jaberi
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Ivo Vachkov wrote: > Hello all, > > On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi > wrote: >> >> On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: >> > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: >> >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implemen

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-14 Thread Ivo Vachkov
Hello all, On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote: > On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: > >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implementation? > BSD-licensed > >> one? > > > > I'm just throwing the ide

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-14 Thread Monthadar Al Jaberi
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: >> Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implementation? BSD-licensed >> one? > > I'm just throwing the idea out, in case it catches the eye of someone > who's looking for an interesting project

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-13 Thread Ivan Voras
On 13 May 2012 06:46, Ivo Vachkov wrote: > Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implementation? BSD-licensed > one? I'm just throwing the idea out, in case it catches the eye of someone who's looking for an interesting project. In the ideal world, I'd say BSD-licensed reimplementation,

Re: B.a.t.m.a.n.

2012-05-13 Thread Ivo Vachkov
Please define "working"? Porting? Kernel-level implementation? BSD-licensed one? Are there any reasons to choose B.A.T.M.A.N. instead of bmx or babel? ... or OLSR? ... or HSLS? On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Ivan Voras wrote: > Is anyone bored enough to try working on this: > http://en.wiki