On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Artyom Viklenko ha scritto:
Very brief example (just to show main idea).
Assume you have thre interfaces in router fxp0 - lan, fxp1 - adsl1, fxp2 -
adsl2.
fxp0 - 192.168.0.1, fxp1 - 192.168.1.2, fxp2 - 192.168.2.2
adsl1 - 192.168.1.1, adsl2 - 192.
Artyom Viklenko ha scritto:
Very brief example (just to show main idea).
Assume you have thre interfaces in router fxp0 - lan, fxp1 - adsl1, fxp2
- adsl2.
fxp0 - 192.168.0.1, fxp1 - 192.168.1.2, fxp2 - 192.168.2.2
adsl1 - 192.168.1.1, adsl2 - 192.168.2.1
$server="192.168.0.2"
$adsl1="192.16
Josh Paetzel ha scritto:
errrm, in pf I can give you a concrete example of how to deal with
this.
Thank you very much. Please see also my reply to Artyom.
Your question seemed to imply that you don't want to load-balance or
really even do round-robin NAT and you're fine with manually cutti
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I have a setup where a FreeBSD box is connected to two ADSL routers:
default gateway is set to the first and, in case of failure, is moved to
the other one. This works perfectly for outgoing connections: in the
event of the switch, I'll have to reconnect, but tha
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Artyom Viklenko ha scritto:
You have to enforce simmetrical routing on your FreeBSD box.
You can use, for example, PF firewall Using such options and features
as labels and route-to/reply-to statemens.
Also it is possible with ipfw, but I prefer PF. :)
Thanks, this i
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I have a setup where a FreeBSD box is connected to two ADSL routers:
default gateway is set to the first and, in case of failure, is moved to
the other one. This works perfectly for outgoing connections: in the
event of the switch, I'll have to reconnect, but tha
On Thursday 12 July 2007, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Artyom Viklenko ha scritto:
> > You have to enforce simmetrical routing on your FreeBSD box.
> > You can use, for example, PF firewall Using such options and
> > features as labels and route-to/reply-to statemens.
> >
> > Also it is possible with
Eric F Crist ha scritto:
> The biggest problem one would have with this sort of setup, is the
upstream provider support. I don't know of any ISP's that are going to
be willing or even able to propagate routes for your static IPs through
their DSL systems. If you want that sort of redundancy
Artyom Viklenko ha scritto:
You have to enforce simmetrical routing on your FreeBSD box.
You can use, for example, PF firewall Using such options and features
as labels and route-to/reply-to statemens.
Also it is possible with ipfw, but I prefer PF. :)
Thanks, this is interesting. However I
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I have a setup where a FreeBSD box is connected to two ADSL routers:
default gateway is set to the first and, in case of failure, is moved to
the other one. This works perfectly for outgoing connections: in the
event of the switch, I'll have to reconnect, but tha
On Jul 12, 2007, at 5:14 AMJul 12, 2007, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Hello.
I have a setup where a FreeBSD box is connected to two ADSL
routers: default gateway is set to the first and, in case of
failure, is moved to the other one. This works perfectly for
outgoing connections: in the event o
11 matches
Mail list logo
