On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 12:01 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is updated version of "ixgbetool" patch.
I will try to give this a try tomorrow.
Cheers,
Hiren
> Here's improved feature list:
> - signature filter list feature available
> - user-defined filter can be use with an ATR.
> To enabl
Hi,
This is updated version of "ixgbetool" patch.
Here's improved feature list:
- signature filter list feature available
- user-defined filter can be use with an ATR.
To enable it, add "hw.ixgbe.cooperative_atr=1" on /boot/loader.conf
Usage is as follows:
ixgbetool [operation]
add_sig_filte
On Sep 30, 2013 5:08 AM, "Takuya ASADA" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is updated version of the patch.
I will give this a try today.
Cheers
Hiren
> Signature filter list feature is added.
>
> Here're usage of ixgbetool:
> - add a filter
> ixgbetool ix0 add_sig_filter tcpv4 10.1.0.1 34763 10.1.0.2 22
Hi,
This is updated version of the patch.
Signature filter list feature is added.
Here're usage of ixgbetool:
- add a filter
ixgbetool ix0 add_sig_filter tcpv4 10.1.0.1 34763 10.1.0.2 22 3
- show filters
ixgbetool ix0 show_sig_filter
- del a filter
ixgbetool ix0 del_sig_filter 1
2013/9/30 Taku
Hi,
I just implemented device specific ioctl with device specific configuration
tool.
It still doesn't support some important features such as:
- FDIR enable / disable via sysctl or tunable params
- ATR enable / disable via sysctl or tunable params
- IPv6 support on signature filter
- signatur
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 1:58 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> 2013/9/27 Adrian Chadd
>
>> On 27 September 2013 00:43, hiren panchasara
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Takuya,
>>>
>>> I see a lot of responses/comments on proposed changes. Was anything
>>> decided
>>> at the end of it? As far as I can tell, its sti
On 27 September 2013 03:09, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 9/27/13 4:53 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> I don't care about whether there's a generic API right now. I'd rather see
>> it done as a staged thing, but _not_ sysctls.
>>
>> Having sysctls to add/remove entries from things is just plain evil.
On 9/27/13 4:53 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I don't care about whether there's a generic API right now. I'd rather see
it done as a staged thing, but _not_ sysctls.
Having sysctls to add/remove entries from things is just plain evil.
I'd rather instead come up with a device specific ioctl API for t
2013/9/27 Adrian Chadd
> On 27 September 2013 00:43, hiren panchasara
> wrote:
>
>
>> Takuya,
>>
>> I see a lot of responses/comments on proposed changes. Was anything
>> decided
>> at the end of it? As far as I can tell, its still not committed to the
>> tree.
>>
>
> I'd rather see an ioctl API
I don't care about whether there's a generic API right now. I'd rather see
it done as a staged thing, but _not_ sysctls.
Having sysctls to add/remove entries from things is just plain evil.
I'd rather instead come up with a device specific ioctl API for this for
now w/ a userland tool for each pa
Hi,
I think there were many comment which says "don't use device specific
sysctls, we should have more generic interface to configure NIC filter,
like Linux's ethtool".
And I heard same idea in last BSDCan, but there's still no proposal of
"generic interface for NIC filter", I suppose.
So, honestl
On 27 September 2013 00:43, hiren panchasara wrote:
> Takuya,
>
> I see a lot of responses/comments on proposed changes. Was anything decided
> at the end of it? As far as I can tell, its still not committed to the
> tree.
>
I'd rather see an ioctl API for that chipset and then have a separate t
Hi,
i don't know what version of the driver currently on head, but on 8.1-R it
isn't the latest driver on INTEL's site.
my dual 10g card 82599EB didn't work well until i upgraded the driver(2.3.8)
and recompiled the kernel.
after that the card worked fine.
Sami
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Ta
Hi,
On Sep 9, 2011, at 10:56 AM, owner-freebsd-...@freebsd.org wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:44:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:13 -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
>>> On Sep 8, 2011, at 14:49 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:34:11AM
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 13:18 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > But it would be a lot nicer if this could be done automatically. Which
> > I believe it can - see the RFS and XPS features in Linux.
>
> Does it cooperate with hw queues and hw hashin
> What this means is that we have
> a failure of abstraction. Abstraction has a cost, and some of the people who
> want
> access to low level queues are not interested in paying an extra abstraction
> cost.
I think a case can be made that that isn't necessarily the case
depending on how well th
On Sep 9, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> But it would be a lot nicer if this could be done automatically. Which
> I believe it can - see the RFS and XPS features in Linux.
Does it cooperate with hw queues and hw hashing now?
When I saw RFS code, it was just worked with RPS.
__
On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 01:44:34AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:13 -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
> > On Sep 8, 2011, at 14:49 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:34:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >> On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 a
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:13 -0400, George Neville-Neil wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 14:49 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:34:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya AS
On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:48 , K. Macy wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:34 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
Hi,
I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4)
On Sep 8, 2011, at 14:49 , Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:34:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
Hi,
I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sys
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 08:34:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a detail:
> > >
> > > - A
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 18:28 +0200, K. Macy wrote:
> > Whatever the mechanism is, the interface should allow for:
> >
> > - Flexible matching on layer 2, 3 and 4 header fields
> > - Masking out some bits before matching (e.g. ignoring priority bits of
> > VLAN tag or least significant bits of IPv4
> Whatever the mechanism is, the interface should allow for:
>
> - Flexible matching on layer 2, 3 and 4 header fields
> - Masking out some bits before matching (e.g. ignoring priority bits of
> VLAN tag or least significant bits of IPv4 address)
> - Priority of rules in case several match a singl
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 11:06 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, September 08, 2011 10:48:25 am K. Macy wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:34 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > >> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wro
On Thursday, September 08, 2011 10:48:25 am K. Macy wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:34 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I implemented Ethernet Flow Direct
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 2:34 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a detail:
>> >
>> > - Adding removing si
On Sep 8, 2011, at 4:35 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:55 +0200, Vlad Galu wrote:
>> On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> 2011/9/5 Ben Hutchings :
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
[...]
Linux also has a gen
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 10:55 +0200, Vlad Galu wrote:
> On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 2011/9/5 Ben Hutchings :
> >> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a deta
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 08:34 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a detail:
> > >
> > > - Adding r
On Monday, September 05, 2011 7:21:12 am Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a detail:
> >
> > - Adding removing signature filter
> > On linux version of ixgbe driver, it has
On Sep 8, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/9/5 Ben Hutchings :
>> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a detail:
>>>
>>> - Adding removing signature filter
>>> On linux version
Hi,
2011/9/5 Ben Hutchings :
> On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a detail:
>>
>> - Adding removing signature filter
>> On linux version of ixgbe driver, it has ability to set/remove perfect
>> filter
On Mon, 2011-09-05 at 15:51 +0900, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I implemented Ethernet Flow Director sysctls to ixgbe(4), here's a detail:
>
> - Adding removing signature filter
> On linux version of ixgbe driver, it has ability to set/remove perfect
> filter from userland using ethtool command.
34 matches
Mail list logo
