08.08.2016 8:57, Sepherosa Ziehau пишет:
We have an optimized wrk here:
https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
I've glanced over your changes to wrk.
(Btw, you have minor bug there: missed 'N' short flag in getopt_long()
invocation
for new --delay option, so "wrk --delay" works but "wrk -N" fails to
On 08.08.2016 08:57, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> We have an optimized wrk here:
> https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
>
> It greatly reduces the # of kqueue syscalls and avoids unnecessary
> setsockopt etc.
What branch should I fetch?
___
freebsd-net@freeb
On 08.08.2016 08:57, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote:
> We have an optimized wrk here:
> https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
Thank you, I'll try it.
> It greatly reduces the # of kqueue syscalls and avoids unnecessary
> setsockopt etc. BTW, how many concurrent connections and threads are
> you testing w/?
We have an optimized wrk here:
https://github.com/sepherosa/wrk
It greatly reduces the # of kqueue syscalls and avoids unnecessary
setsockopt etc. BTW, how many concurrent connections and threads are
you testing w/? Did you reduce the MSL on your client machines?
Default local port range probabl
07.08.2016 1:03, Eugene Grosbein пишет:
Hi!
Is there any high performance benchmark acting as http client for outer http
server
capable to receive 40Gbps without overwhelming CPU with insane number of
syscalls?
I've tried benchmarks/wrk version 4.0.2 and it works just fine upto 20Gbps
for my
I'm not sure it will help you at those levels, but have you tried boom?
https://github.com/rakyll/boom
On 06/08/2016 19:03, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
Hi!
Is there any high performance benchmark acting as http client for
outer http server
capable to receive 40Gbps without overwhelming CPU with ins
