On 06/04/12 13:33, Colin Percival wrote:
On 06/03/12 20:14, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
On 06/04/12 02:51, Colin Percival wrote:
I've attached a new patch which:
1. adds a IFCAP_TSO_MSS "capability" and a if_tx_tso_mss field to struct ifnet,
A minor thing, but I don't like the overloading of the
On 06/03/12 20:14, Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> On 06/04/12 02:51, Colin Percival wrote:
>> I've attached a new patch which:
>> 1. adds a IFCAP_TSO_MSS "capability" and a if_tx_tso_mss field to struct
>> ifnet,
>
> A minor thing, but I don't like the overloading of the term MSS. Perhaps
> s/MSS/CHUN
On 06/04/12 02:51, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/30/12 08:30, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is with
the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
handle scatter-gathe
On 06/03/12 15:56, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On 3. Jun 2012, at 16:51 , Colin Percival wrote:
>> I've attached a new patch which:
>> 1. adds a IFCAP_TSO_MSS "capability" and a if_tx_tso_mss field to struct
>> ifnet,
>> 2. sets these in netfront when the IFCAP_TSO4 flag is set,
>> 3. extends tcp_maxm
On 3. Jun 2012, at 16:51 , Colin Percival wrote:
> On 05/30/12 08:30, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
>> On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
>>> The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is with
>>> the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
>
On 06/03/12 12:05, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> On 06/03/12 12:51, Colin Percival wrote:
>> I've attached a new patch which:
>> 1. adds a IFCAP_TSO_MSS "capability" and a if_tx_tso_mss field to struct
>> ifnet,
>> 2. sets these in netfront when the IFCAP_TSO4 flag is set,
>> 3. extends tcp_maxmtu to r
On 06/03/12 12:51, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/30/12 08:30, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is with
the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
handle scatter-gathe
On 05/30/12 08:30, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
>> The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is with
>> the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
>> handle scatter-gather writes with lots of pieces, aka.
On 05/30/12 18:35, Colin Percival wrote:
On 05/30/12 08:30, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is with
the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
handle scatter-gathe
On 05/30/12 08:30, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
>> The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is with
>> the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
>> handle scatter-gather writes with lots of pieces, aka.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
> On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is
>> with
>> the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
>> handle scatter-gathe
On 05/30/12 10:59, Colin Percival wrote:
Hi all,
The Xen virtual network interface has an issue (ok, really the issue is with
the linux back-end, but that's what most people are using) where it can't
handle scatter-gather writes with lots of pieces, aka. long mbuf chains.
This currently bites us
12 matches
Mail list logo
