Bruce M Simpson wrote:
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 03:00:44PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
So I will be updating the patch in the next 24 hours. Given that it
seems stable for values 2047 <= n <= 4095 with SOCK_DGRAM I am inclined
to commit with the maximum raised to 4095 and lazy allocation in
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 03:00:44PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> So I will be updating the patch in the next 24 hours. Given that it
> seems stable for values 2047 <= n <= 4095 with SOCK_DGRAM I am inclined
> to commit with the maximum raised to 4095 and lazy allocation in place.
Committed on HE
Hello,
On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 08:40:30PM -0400, Stephen Clark wrote:
> Thanks for your effort - I will try it on monday at work in a test
> configuration I have setup with
> a hundred gre/vpn tunnels and ospf. This configuration needs a
> multicast membership group
> of 100.
Thank you! I have
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Hello,
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 02:12:27PM +0100, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
Therefore, joining the same group 20 times on different interfaces
would exceed IP_MAX_MEMBERSHIPS.
Fixing this in any way would still break the ip_mroute_kmod ABI and
as such is a HEAD change.
