05.04.2018 16:53, Julian Elischer wrote:
> why not just use the ng-pppoe node? :-)
Well, I do not need full-blown pppoe session nor interface configuration,
only send thousands oe broadcasts then collect all replies, period.
Low-overhead solution is preferred.
___
On 22/3/18 3:08 am, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
22.03.2018 1:08, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
OK, so, if I have understood all that has been said in this thread so
far, then I would assert that, from the perspective of a simple-minded
and naive end user (e.g. me), the assertion that I originally quote
On 2018-Mar-21 13:50:26 -0700, "Ronald F. Guilmette"
wrote:
>
>In message <5ab2c0b1.3020...@grosbein.net>,
>Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
>>It does not mean you need to stick with raw sockets API.
>>libpcap can be used too, as I've shown in previous letter.
>
>Thank you. If zmap ends up not suiting
In message <5ab2c0b1.3020...@grosbein.net>,
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>It does not mean you need to stick with raw sockets API.
>libpcap can be used too, as I've shown in previous letter.
Thank you. If zmap ends up not suiting my needs, I will
definitely look into libpcap.
_
22.03.2018 3:03, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>> Why should you concentrate on RAW sockets?
>
> Well, for reasons that are completely legitimate, and that I'll
> explain in detail, if anyone is seriously interested, I'd like
> to check each IPv4 address within a set of about 90 or so
> modest sized
In message <5ab2ad9f.6040...@grosbein.net>,
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>Why should you concentrate on RAW sockets?
Well, for reasons that are completely legitimate, and that I'll
explain in detail, if anyone is seriously interested, I'd like
to check each IPv4 address within a set of about 90 or s
22.03.2018 1:08, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> OK, so, if I have understood all that has been said in this thread so
> far, then I would assert that, from the perspective of a simple-minded
> and naive end user (e.g. me), the assertion that I originally quoted
> -is- in fact correct, i.e. one -cann
22.03.2018 0:38, Ronald F. Guilmette пишет:
>
> In message <5ab1a9c5.9050...@grosbein.net>,
> Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
>> 21.03.2018 3:09, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>>
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7048448/raw-sockets-on-bsd-operating-systems
>>> "Using raw sockets isn't har
In message <5ab23fb9.7050...@grosbein.net>,
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>On 21.03.2018 10:55, Matt Joras wrote:
>> Saying "Not for FreeBSD" is needlessly confusing and not accurate. In
>> the common parlance "raw sockets" does not refer to libdnet, which is
>> not a part of the FreeBSD base system.
In message <5ab1a9c5.9050...@grosbein.net>,
Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>21.03.2018 3:09, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>
>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7048448/raw-sockets-on-bsd-operating-systems
>> "Using raw sockets isn't hard but it's not entirely portable. For
>> instance,
> On 21. Mar 2018, at 03:43, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> On 21.03.2018 08:03, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>>> On 21. Mar 2018, at 00:39, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>>
>>> 21.03.2018 3:09, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>>
I'm going to be doing some stuff with raw sockets pretty soon, and
while
On 21.03.2018 10:55, Matt Joras wrote:
> I'm going to be doing some stuff with raw sockets pretty soon, and
> while scrounging around, looking for some nice coding examples, I
> found the following very curious comment on one particular message
> board:
>
>
> https:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:43 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
> On 21.03.2018 08:03, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>
>>> On 21. Mar 2018, at 00:39, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>>
>>> 21.03.2018 3:09, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>>
I'm going to be doing some stuff with raw sockets pretty soon, and
while s
On 21.03.2018 08:03, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> On 21. Mar 2018, at 00:39, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>>
>> 21.03.2018 3:09, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>>
>>> I'm going to be doing some stuff with raw sockets pretty soon, and
>>> while scrounging around, looking for some nice coding examples, I
>>> fou
> On 21. Mar 2018, at 00:39, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
>
> 21.03.2018 3:09, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
>> I'm going to be doing some stuff with raw sockets pretty soon, and
>> while scrounging around, looking for some nice coding examples, I
>> found the following very curious comment on one part
21.03.2018 3:09, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> I'm going to be doing some stuff with raw sockets pretty soon, and
> while scrounging around, looking for some nice coding examples, I
> found the following very curious comment on one particular message
> board:
>
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/q
I'm going to be doing some stuff with raw sockets pretty soon, and
while scrounging around, looking for some nice coding examples, I
found the following very curious comment on one particular message
board:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7048448/raw-sockets-on-bsd-operating-systems
17 matches
Mail list logo
