Re: Racoon/IPSEC Tunnel in 9.2 vs 10.0

2014-04-15 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. On 15.04.2014 10:27, Matt Lager wrote: > Do you utilize PF as your firewalling platform, because I'm slightly > suspicious that could be the cause. I do. Eugene. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free

Re: Racoon/IPSEC Tunnel in 9.2 vs 10.0

2014-04-14 Thread Matt Lager
Do you utilize PF as your firewalling platform, because I'm slightly suspicious that could be the cause. In fact, it's a bit silly I haven't disabled it entirely to see if that resolves my issues. I'll probably run tests doing that tomorrow and will report back. PF did undergo a lot of changes

Re: Racoon/IPSEC Tunnel in 9.2 vs 10.0

2014-04-14 Thread Eugene M. Zheganin
Hi. On 10.04.2014 02:15, Matt Lager wrote: > I have used IPSEC tunnels w/ racoon to establish point to point VPN > connections for a long time, with great success. I recently decided to > upgrade one of my endpoints to 10.0-RELEASE from 9.2-RELEASE-p3. I > didn't do an upgrade but did a fresh inst

Racoon/IPSEC Tunnel in 9.2 vs 10.0

2014-04-09 Thread Matt Lager
I have used IPSEC tunnels w/ racoon to establish point to point VPN connections for a long time, with great success. I recently decided to upgrade one of my endpoints to 10.0-RELEASE from 9.2-RELEASE-p3. I didn't do an upgrade but did a fresh installation of 10.0-RELEASE, but applied the identi