Re: RFC 3390: Increasing TCP's Initial Window

2002-11-04 Thread Oleg Polyakov
--- Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I have patches lying around > >> that varies the initial window size from 2 to 4 depending on the MSS, > >> as specified in the RFC. > > > We could not apply those patches until we fix a bug serverside which > > increments snd_cwnd with 1

Re: RFC 3390: Increasing TCP's Initial Window

2002-11-04 Thread Jeffrey Hsu
>> I have patches lying around >> that varies the initial window size from 2 to 4 depending on the MSS, >> as specified in the RFC. > We could not apply those patches until we fix a bug serverside which > increments snd_cwnd with 1 mss somewhere... > Take a look on TCP session. No, no

Re: RFC 3390: Increasing TCP's Initial Window

2002-11-04 Thread Oleg Polyakov
--- Jeffrey Hsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Time to default net.inet.tcp.slowstart_flightsize to 4? > > A straight initial window of 4 is too big. I have patches lying around > that varies the initial window size from 2 to 4 depending on the MSS, > as specified in the RFC. > >

Re: RFC 3390: Increasing TCP's Initial Window

2002-11-01 Thread Jeffrey Hsu
> Time to default net.inet.tcp.slowstart_flightsize to 4? A straight initial window of 4 is too big. I have patches lying around that varies the initial window size from 2 to 4 depending on the MSS, as specified in the RFC. Jeffrey To U

RFC 3390: Increasing TCP's Initial Window

2002-11-01 Thread Lars Eggert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 3390 Title: Increasing TCP's Initial Window Author(s): M. Allman, S. Floyd, C. Partridge Status: Standards Track Date: October 2002 U