On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 11:57:05PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:30:01PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > Ian Smith wrote:
> > >On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > > Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > > > There a difference between the documented and actual behaviour o
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 03:55:07PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
Which is what happens now, right? Same behaviour on tee reinjection as
divert does seem consistent. So if there is a problem, it's only with
the original packet continuing with the nex
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 03:55:07PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
...
> >>>Which is what happens now, right? Same behaviour on tee reinjection as
> >>>divert does seem consistent. So if there is a problem, it's only with
> >>>the original packet continuing with the next rule
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:30:01PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
There a difference between the documented and actual behaviour of
"ipfw tee" which occurs when there are multiple rules with the
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 01:30:01PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Ian Smith wrote:
> >On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > > > There a difference between the documented and actual behaviour of
> > > > "ipfw tee" which occurs when there are multiple rules with th
Ian Smith wrote:
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > There a difference between the documented and actual behaviour of
> > "ipfw tee" which occurs when there are multiple rules with the same
> > number, e.g.
> >
> > rule_id number body
> > r1
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > There a difference between the documented and actual behaviour of
> > "ipfw tee" which occurs when there are multiple rules with the same
> > number, e.g.
> >
> >rule_id number body
> >r1 500 tee port1 ds
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
There a difference between the documented and actual behaviour of
"ipfw tee" which occurs when there are multiple rules with the same
number, e.g.
rule_id number body
r1 500 tee port1 dst-ip 1.2.3.0/24
r2 500 tee port2 dst-ip 1.2.4.0/
There a difference between the documented and actual behaviour of
"ipfw tee" which occurs when there are multiple rules with the same
number, e.g.
rule_id number body
r1 500 tee port1 dst-ip 1.2.3.0/24
r2 500 tee port2 dst-ip 1.2.4.0/24
r3 50
