Yonghyeon Pyun wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:27:48PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:10:35PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > First off, I hope you don't mind that I cross-posted this,
> > > > but I wanted to make
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:27:48PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:10:35PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > First off, I hope you don't mind that I cross-posted this,
> > > but I wanted to make sure both the NFS/iSCSI and networki
2014-03-28 5:37 GMT+08:00 Rick Macklem :
> Christopher Forgeron wrote:
> > I'm quite sure the problem is on 9.2-RELEASE, not 9.1-RELEASE or
> > earlier,
> > as a 9.2-STABLE from last year I have doesn't exhibit the problem.
> > New
> > code in if.c at line 660 looks to be what is starting this, w
Marcelo Araujo wrote:
> Hello All,
>
>
> 2014-03-27 8:27 GMT+08:00 Rick Macklem :
> >
> > Well, bumping it from 32->35 is all it would take for NFS (can't
> > comment
> > w.r.t. iSCSI). ixgbe uses 100 for the 82598 chip and 32 for the
> > 82599
> > (just so others aren't confused by the above com
Christopher Forgeron wrote:
> I'm quite sure the problem is on 9.2-RELEASE, not 9.1-RELEASE or
> earlier,
> as a 9.2-STABLE from last year I have doesn't exhibit the problem.
> New
> code in if.c at line 660 looks to be what is starting this, which
> makes me
> wonder how TSO was being handled bef
I'm quite sure the problem is on 9.2-RELEASE, not 9.1-RELEASE or earlier,
as a 9.2-STABLE from last year I have doesn't exhibit the problem. New
code in if.c at line 660 looks to be what is starting this, which makes me
wonder how TSO was being handled before 9.2.
I also like Rick's NFS patch for
Hello All,
2014-03-27 8:27 GMT+08:00 Rick Macklem :
>
> Well, bumping it from 32->35 is all it would take for NFS (can't comment
> w.r.t. iSCSI). ixgbe uses 100 for the 82598 chip and 32 for the 82599
> (just so others aren't confused by the above comment). I understand
> your point was w.r.t. us
pyu...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:10:35PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > First off, I hope you don't mind that I cross-posted this,
> > but I wanted to make sure both the NFS/iSCSI and networking
> > types say it.
> > If you look in this mailing list thread:
> >
>
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 07:10:35PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First off, I hope you don't mind that I cross-posted this,
> but I wanted to make sure both the NFS/iSCSI and networking
> types say it.
> If you look in this mailing list thread:
>
> http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?185
Hi,
First off, I hope you don't mind that I cross-posted this,
but I wanted to make sure both the NFS/iSCSI and networking
types say it.
If you look in this mailing list thread:
http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1850411724.1687820.1395621539316.JavaMail.root
you'll see that several people hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
