RE: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-12 Thread Cambria, Mike
> -Original Message- > From: Andrew R. Reiter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > :Next I'll try to track down if this is this a libnet problem, libnids > :problem or dsniff problem, so I know which project I need to inform. > > IIRC, the problem is BPF b/c it doesn't know the checksum since the

RE: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-12 Thread Andrew R. Reiter
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, Cambria, Mike wrote: : :> #define XL905B_CSUM_FEATURES0 : :This worked. dsniff is behaving just fine now. : :Next I'll try to track down if this is this a libnet problem, libnids :problem or dsniff problem, so I know which project I need to inform. IIRC, the proble

RE: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-12 Thread Cambria, Mike
> #define XL905B_CSUM_FEATURES0 This worked. dsniff is behaving just fine now. Next I'll try to track down if this is this a libnet problem, libnids problem or dsniff problem, so I know which project I need to inform. Thanks, MikeC To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] wit

Re: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-12 Thread Jonathan Lemon
No - ifconfig shows the actual settings. 'ifconfig -m' will show both the configured settings and the driver capability list. -- Jonathan On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 10:43:24AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > Actually, I seem to remember that the ifconfig output only shows > the driver's capabilities,

Re: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-12 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Actually, I seem to remember that the ifconfig output only shows the driver's capabilities, not the actual setting. cheers luigi On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 12:00:48PM -0500, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:06:13AM -0400, Cambria, Mike wrote: > > > -Original

Re: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-12 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 09:06:13AM -0400, Cambria, Mike wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Jonathan Lemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >> > > > >My guess is that doing hw checksum by the nic could be the > > issue. This is > > >the only real difference I can see at present. > > > >

RE: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-12 Thread Cambria, Mike
> -Original Message- > From: Jonathan Lemon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >> > > >My guess is that doing hw checksum by the nic could be the > issue. This is > >the only real difference I can see at present. > > > >Any ideas? > > Test your theory. Turn off hardware checksums with 'ifcon

Re: xl checksum and dsniff

2002-07-11 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > >Hi, > >I've been using dsniff on 4.6-Stable (and earlier) for a while. I've setup >a faster machine to run this in the lab. This machine however has an >built-in xl interface. Things don't work. > >The 'old' machine on the same hub works just fine. I