On Wed, 31 May 2006, 15:21-0300, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> Thanks for all replies !
>
> After apply the patch, I must rebuild just the kernel... right ?!
Correct.
--
Maxim Konovalov
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
PM
To: Alexandre Biancalana
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: requests for mbufs denied increasing
On Wed, 31 May 2006, 10:29-0300, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
Hi list,
I've a NFS/FTP server used as backup server, receiving few
connections with high volume of data (100G
different problem.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Maxim Konovalov
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 3:41 PM
To: Alexandre Biancalana
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: requests for mbufs denied increasing
On Wed, 31 May 2006, 10:29
On Wed, 31 May 2006, 10:29-0300, Alexandre Biancalana wrote:
> Hi list,
>
>I've a NFS/FTP server used as backup server, receiving few
> connections with high volume of data (100GB/Day). During this period
> the "requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters)" of
> netstat -m is incre
Hi,
I have tried to debug this and it turns out that it is not an allocation
failure at all. It happens as part of uma_reclaim, which will eventually
call uma_zfree_internal which increments the counters.
When I use the following patch, uma_reclaim will skip uma_zfree_internal for
both mbuf and m
On 4/24/06, Vlad GALU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The machine in question is a 6.1-RC. It serves a quite big number
> of clients (the lowest concurrency figures are around 2000, with peaks
> up to 9000). The in/out buffers for tcp sockets are 8K each.
> kern.ipc.nmbclusters is set to 327680. T
Gabor MICSKO wrote:
Hi!
I have a relative high traffic server, running Apache, MySQL and Drupal.
With FreeBSD 6.0 and 6.1-PRERELEASE i got some distressing "netstat -m"
outputs.
Can anybody explain for me what does this message mean exactly?
"16064849/9164254/9384500 requests for mbufs denied
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 21:55 +0100, Peter Blok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have them too. They only happen on a Realtek re card. They don't happen on
> an Intel em card. I'm still narrowing down why this happens.
Hm, interesting. I got this messages with an onboard Intel PRO/1000
Gigabit Ethernet Card (em
Hi,
I have them too. They only happen on a Realtek re card. They don't happen on
an Intel em card. I'm still narrowing down why this happens.
I have now disabled carp, because I have a feeling it is related to
promiscuous mode. So far they have not happened after disabling carp.
Peter
-Orig
