On 2007-10-19 10:48, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and
> RELENG_7. Is anyone eager to pull it down to RELENG_6 as well,
> because I don't have the resources available at the moment. The
> update was crucial to me in HEAD a
Hi Max,
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:48:52AM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and
> RELENG_7.
Thank you for updating these two components!
Regards,
Brix
--
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpP4hT3J34WE.pgp
Description: PGP sig
Okay. libpcap 0.9.8 and tcpdump 3.9.8 are now imported into HEAD and
RELENG_7. Is anyone eager to pull it down to RELENG_6 as well, because I
don't have the resources available at the moment. The update was crucial
to me in HEAD and RELENG_7 to get a working pflog tcpdump, but RELENG_6
isn't
On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> On Friday 12 October 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > > On Sunday 30 September 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to get some eyes on
> > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tcpdump/
On Friday 12 October 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > On Sunday 30 September 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to get some eyes on
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tcpdump/ in order to get $subj
> > > into the tree. Let me know if
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> On Sunday 30 September 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to get some eyes on
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tcpdump/ in order to get $subj into
> > the tree. Let me know if you find any problems. Thanks.
> >
> > This should also t
On Sunday 30 September 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get some eyes on http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/tcpdump/
> in order to get $subj into the tree. Let me know if you find any
> problems. Thanks.
>
> This should also take care of bin/116610, by the way.
Please refresh - the fir
> Its capture file editor, bittwiste, allow you to change most fields
> in Ethernet, ARP, IP, ICMP, TCP, and UDP headers and you can specify
> your own payload. It is possible for the payload to cover the ICMP,
> TCP, or UDP header itself (checksum is corrected
> automatically). Tcprewri
On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:34:12AM -0700, Yeow C.H. wrote:
> Thanks Brian.
>
> Simply put Bit-Twist is smaller, do more, medium specific (Ethernet
> II - IEEE 802.3) suite.
>
> Bittwist (packet generator) does not differs much from tcpreplay
> program. I would admit if you say tcprepl
Thanks Brian.
Simply put Bit-Twist is smaller, do more, medium specific (Ethernet II - IEEE
802.3) suite.
Bittwist (packet generator) does not differs much from tcpreplay program. I
would admit if you say tcpreplay can do everything that bittwist can do. But
bittwist implementation i
On Sun, Apr 16, 2006 at 08:02:04AM -0700, Yeow C.H. wrote:
> It is designed to compliment tcpdump, which by itself has done a great
> job
> in capturing network traffic. With Bit-Twist, you can now regenerate the
> captured traffic onto a live network. Packets are generated from save
I have a patch, which I apparently never committed, to make libpcap
respect debug.bpf_bufsize if it's larger than 32k. I will make sure
this gets into libpcap and then a release and then FreeBSD (whew).
Bill
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the
We maintain our own patches here as well to get around this problem.
IMHO, it is far better to have some applications "waste" a meg or two
of buffer space than to hamstring any high-performance bpf app that
runs on a FreeBSD box.
This is most likely a trivial code fix -- how hard would it be to
Petri Helenius wrote:
> Guy Helmer wrote:
> >I use "sysctl debug.dbf_bufsize=131072" on my appliances to increase the
> >BPF buffer size to something more reasonable without having to directly
> >modify libpcap.
> >
> Hope you're not disappointed to find out that modifying that parameter has
> no
Guy Helmer wrote:
I use "sysctl debug.dbf_bufsize=131072" on my appliances to increase the
BPF buffer size to something more reasonable without having to directly
modify libpcap.
Hope you're not disappointed to find out that modifying that parameter has
no effect when using applications
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
Suggestions what would it take to make libpcap included in the FreeBSD
distribution
stop tweaking BPF buffer size by default?
tcpdump.org people have been nonresponsive about changing it there, so I
On Fri, 13 Dec 2002, Petri Helenius wrote:
> Suggestions what would it take to make libpcap included in the FreeBSD
> distribution stop tweaking BPF buffer size by default?
I use "sysctl debug.dbf_bufsize=131072" on my appliances to increase the
BPF buffer size to something more reasonable witho
On Fri, Dec 13, 2002 at 12:25:42PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> Suggestions what would it take to make libpcap included in the FreeBSD
> distribution
> stop tweaking BPF buffer size by default?
>
> tcpdump.org people have been nonresponsive about changing it there, so I
> would suggest
> it
18 matches
Mail list logo
