Qing,
The reason for which I posted this note here was to get *technical*
input on the contents of the I-D.
So far 99% of the discussion in TCPM has been around whether to accept
this document as a wg item or not, whether to change the outline or not,
etc. (i.e., "procedural discussions", if you
I have been monitoring the tcpm ML debate about this draft for
the past year. Frankly for the past two months the volume of
tinygrams on the subject is so overwhelming I stopped reading
any email relating to this topic.
I think Mark Allman's email titled "TCPM" posted on March 2
put things into p
