Hi,
Regarding RFC 6636, I don't know anything about it. It wasn't published
until last month, so MLDv2 in FreeBSD came 3 years before it.
On 21/06/12 14:16, GuYong wrote:
> > > My reading of it suggests that we are doing the right thing. We do
> > > accept it and process it, but, like the text im
ubject: Re: Question about MLDv2 implemenation in Kernel
>
> All,
>
> I'm working on something new just now,and am in a conference, but here
> is my 2p.
>
> On 20/06/12 22:20, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > On 20 Jun 2012, at 01:12, GuYong wrote:
> >> 1. RFC3810
All,
I'm working on something new just now,and am in a conference, but here
is my 2p.
On 20/06/12 22:20, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On 20 Jun 2012, at 01:12, GuYong wrote:
>> 1. RFC3810 clause 6.1 mentions there is a Source Retransmission Counter
>> associated to each source, so that the merged report
On 20 Jun 2012, at 01:12, GuYong wrote:
> 1. RFC3810 clause 6.1 mentions there is a Source Retransmission Counter
> associated to each source, so that the merged report could contain the
> content that is interrupted by a new state change report BUT, I
> didn't see this is implemented
Hi,
On 20 Jun 2012, at 01:12, GuYong wrote:
>
> Hi, everyone,
> I'm looking at the MLDv2 implemenation in kernel, and there seem to be some
> issues, could anyone confirm them?
> 1. RFC3810 clause 6.1 mentions there is a Source Retransmission Counter
> associated to each source, so that the
