"The master of the address sends out CARP advertisement messages via
multicast using the CARP protocol (IP Protocol 112) on a regular basis,
and the backup hosts listen for this advertisement. If the
advertisements stop, the backup hosts will begin advertising."
I'm afraid CARP will not be ro
You can also take a look on LVS/IPVS...
http://kb.linuxvirtualserver.org/wiki/LVS/TUN_mode_with_FreeBSD_and_Solaris_realserver
The software is also available for FreeBSD and works on WAN
architectures. I didn't test it yet but used sucessfully on Lin boxes.
Hope this helps...
Philippe LAQUET
Max Laier wrote:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 18:52, Mike Jakubik wrote:
Max Laier wrote:
Have a look at: http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/#big for
one idea. All requirements (carp, pf and pfsync) are available in
FreeBSD as well.
You can load balance with CARP, but A
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 18:52, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > Have a look at: http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/#big for
> > one idea. All requirements (carp, pf and pfsync) are available in
> > FreeBSD as well.
>
> You can load balance with CARP, but AFAIK it only works
Max Laier wrote:
Have a look at: http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/#big for one
idea. All requirements (carp, pf and pfsync) are available in FreeBSD as
well.
You can load balance with CARP, but AFAIK it only works on the local
network segment, i.e. it wont work past a router.
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 04:22:54PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
M> > > I'd like to set up a load balancing and resiliance system to
M> > > load balance between a bunch of web servers running Apache tomcat
M> > > (slow java stuff). Ideally I'd like each client IP to get mapped to a
M> > > certain server
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 15:26, Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Baldur Gislason (baldur) writes:
> > I'd like to set up a load balancing and resiliance system to
> > load balance between a bunch of web servers running Apache tomcat
> > (slow java stuff). Ideally I'd like each client IP to get mapped to a
Phil Regnauld wrote:
> Baldur Gislason (baldur) writes:
>> I'd like to set up a load balancing and resiliance system to
>> load balance between a bunch of web servers running Apache tomcat (slow java
>> stuff).
>> Ideally I'd like each client IP to get mapped to a certain server and keep
>> that
Baldur Gislason (baldur) writes:
> I'd like to set up a load balancing and resiliance system to
> load balance between a bunch of web servers running Apache tomcat (slow java
> stuff).
> Ideally I'd like each client IP to get mapped to a certain server and keep
> that
> mapping throughout the ent
Michael Jeung wrote:
We currently use DNS round-robin to balance traffic to servers. We've
recently run into situations where multiple search engine spiders are
crawling our webservers. They appear to be targeting specific
webservers by IP address. This defeats DNS round-robin and as a
resu
On Thu, 18 May 2006 15:42:24 -0700
Michael Jeung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> We currently use DNS round-robin to balance traffic to servers.
> We've recently run into situations where multiple search engine
> spiders are crawling our webservers. They appear to be targeting
Rob Viau wrote:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some
software that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the
user
> On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote:
>> Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some
>> > software that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
>> > This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the
>> > user of
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
G Bryant escreveu:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
Complicated ? Its possible ?
TELECOM
LOAD SHARING PER PACKET
---
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 14:03 -0200, Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
> It would be very good if could make this.
>
> Which the solution?
Linux supports this feature if you build advanced routing options into
the kernel.
The only FreeBSD code I've seen to do something like this is at:
http://www.dsm.f
Corey Smith escreveu:
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote:
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some
software that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the
use
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 17:19 +0200, G Bryant wrote:
> Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
>
> >
> > It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some
> > software that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
> > This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the
> > user of NAT o
Daniel Dias Gonçalves wrote:
Complicated ? Its possible ?
TELECOM
LOAD SHARING PER PACKET
--
| | |
Dnia Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 08:33:34AM -0200, Daniel Dias Gonçalves napisał(a):
>
> It is possible to make this balancing with the PF ? Exists some software
> that I make this ? Zebra can help me?
> This type of balancing gives to problems with the navigation of the user
> of NAT or IP valid ?
> I
> -Original Message-
> Totally true and problem get worse when you already have the equipament
> and have to implement a solution over it.
> We are also using a script at this moment but it doesn't do load
> balance. What it only do is to check if the current provide
> are okay, and if not,
Totally true and problem get worse when you already have the equipament
and have to implement a solution over it.
We are also using a script at this moment but it doesn't do load
balance. What it only do is to check if the current provide
are okay, and if not, it change the default route to the o
>
> Why dont you all do yourselves a favor and go out and buy one of those
> home dsl/cable modems that have 2 ports and provide load balancing
> instead.
>
[Mitch says:]
The only ones I've seen were rather expensive and aren't modem's - they are
routers... so you have to still have your ADSL mo
Mitch (Bitblock) said:
> Short answer is "Yes".
>
> For basic failover, I've used a script which monitors link status and
> function (by pinging or connecting to a remote host). Failover is
> accomplished by switching the default route.
>
> Using ipfw fwd statements, you can make both links functi
> NiY wrote:
>
> >Greetings! I have yet to find a definitive answer on this subject, so
> >I was hoping someone would let me know the official way to go about
> >this, or if it's even possible.
> >
> >We have two ADSL services coming into out building. We would like to
> >use them both on one netw
NiY wrote:
Greetings! I have yet to find a definitive answer on this subject, so
I was hoping someone would let me know the official way to go about
this, or if it's even possible.
We have two ADSL services coming into out building. We would like to
use them both on one network, using a multi-home
NiY wrote:
Greetings! I have yet to find a definitive answer on this subject, so
I was hoping someone would let me know the official way to go about
this, or if it's even possible.
We have two ADSL services coming into out building. We would like to
use them both on one network, using a multi-homed
Matt wrote:
> You may try some other kind of load balance and fail safe from
> www.xgforce.com. It's a layer 3 and layer 7 global clustering software for
> FreeBSD.
Wrong kind of "load balancing". The original poster wanted
channel bonding, not server load balancing.
The layer 3 in the referen
PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2002 9:14 AM
Subject: Re: load balancing with 2 nic cards possible?
> I have tried that fec driver, no luck. I get the interface up, but when I
try
> to transmit packets over it I get "invalid
The FEC works for me doing the following on 4.5-STABLE:
# cd /usr/src/sys
# tar -zxvf /fec.tar.gz
# cd modules/netgrah/fec && make install
# kldload ng_fec.ko
# ngctl mkpeer fec dummy fec
# ngctl msg fec0: add_iface '"fxp0"'
# ngctl msg fec0: add_iface '"fxp1"'
# ngctl msg fec0: set_mode_inet
t
I have tried that fec driver, no luck. I get the interface up, but when I try
to transmit packets over it I get "invalid argument" or something like that,
I had the network cards hooked to a Cisco catalyst and I had grouped the
ports, and I've tried two types of network cards, 3com 905C and Int
Len Conrad writes:
> Is anybody using netgraph and multilink ppp (recommended by PHK) to
> load-balance outgoing traffic over multiple (4 or more) T1's? stable?
> efficient enough to push the T1's towards practial limits?
Should work no problem.
If you have FreeBSD on both ends, you might als
31 matches
Mail list logo
