On 08/08/16 15:40, Sreekanth Rupavatharam wrote:
> Quite possibly, but my question remains. If the register doesn’t have any
> specific value for just a received packet(no other events), how is a value of
> 0 considered to be wrong? Or to flip the question around, what should be the
> value of
Quite possibly, but my question remains. If the register doesn’t have any
specific value for just a received packet(no other events), how is a value of 0
considered to be wrong? Or to flip the question around, what should be the
value of the register for just receive of a packet?
Thanks,
-Sree
On 08/08/16 13:14, Sreekanth Rupavatharam wrote:
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Sreekanth
>
>> On Aug 8, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>>
>> Is this with the "lem" driver or the "em" driver under QEMU?
>>
> It's for lem driver under qemu. My question is mainly about there being no
> specific bit
Thanks,
-Sreekanth
> On Aug 8, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Sean Bruno wrote:
>
> Is this with the "lem" driver or the "em" driver under QEMU?
>
It's for lem driver under qemu. My question is mainly about there being no
specific bit for a packet received in this register or am I missing something
he
On 08/05/16 12:01, Sreekanth Rupavatharam wrote:
> We have this code snippet in em_irq_fast
>
> ifp =
> adapter->ifp;
>
>
>
>
> reg_icr = E100
We have this code snippet in em_irq_fast
ifp = adapter->ifp;
reg_icr = E1000_READ_REG(&adapter->hw, E1000_ICR);
/* Hot eject? */
if (reg_icr == 0x)
return FILTER_STRAY;
/* Definitely not our interrupt. */
if (reg
