Bill Fenner wrote:
I plan to commit this patch some time this week.
Please do.
Committed, with doc and version bumps.
It doesn't look like the TBF can be removed straight away; there are
consumers.
BMS
"And I've been dreaming of sleep... and ape-men with metal parts." --
David Bowie
>I plan to commit this patch some time this week.
>---mroute-notunnels.diff, text/x-patch follows---
Please do. Only one comment:
>@@ -859,8 +816,6 @@ X_ip_mrouter_done(void)
> /*
> * Reset de-encapsulation cache
> */
>-last_encap_src = INADDR_ANY;
>-last_encap_vif = NULL;
I count no objections and +1 in favour from Andre.
To maintain POLA, I will decapitate (Argh, pun) it from HEAD with no MFC
to begin with.
Arguments in favour:
* mrouted was removed from the base system.
* PIM does not use MROUTING's IPIP tunnels, and PIM is regarded as the
standard these day
How would you all feel about removing the old encapsulation methods from
IPv4 multicast routing as OpenBSD has done?
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/netinet/ip_mroute.c.diff?r1=1.42&r2=1.43
The last time I deployed any such infrastructure, I had to use gif(4);
in a NATted world,
