https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174087
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|Open|In Progress
CC|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174087
Richard Scheffenegger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsch...@freebsd.org
--- Co
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174087
Eitan Adler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|In Progress |Open
--- Comment #5 from Eitan Adler
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174087
Hiren Panchasara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|an...@freebsd.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
--- Com
Synopsis: [tcp] Problems with ephemeral port selection
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-net->andre
Responsible-Changed-By: andre
Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Dec 11 22:01:32 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Looking into it.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=174
Old Synopsis: Problems with ephemeral port selection
New Synopsis: [tcp] Problems with ephemeral port selection
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-net
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Dec 9 17:56:08 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to maintai
a problem
> report too and post the PR-number here so we can better track it?
Done. PR-number is: kern/174087
> From: Fernando Gont
> Subject: Re: Problems with ephemeral port selection
>
> Please take a look at the discussion on how to "steal" incomming
> connections
Hi, Keith,
On 11/30/2012 11:09 AM, Keith Arner wrote:
>
> - behave uniformly whether or not SO_REUSEADDR has been set
> - allow outgoing connection requests to re-use a local port number, so
>long as the remaining elements of the tuple (laddr, fport, faddr) are
>unique
Please take a loo
I've noticed some issues with ephemeral port number selection from
tcp_connect(), which limit the number of concurrent, outgoing connections
that can be established (connect(), rather than accept()). Sifting through
the source code, I believe the issuess stem from two problems in the
tcp_connect()
