On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Alexander Langer wrote:
> Also sprach Markus Oestreicher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Is there a way to get the real processor usage including
> > the time spent on polling?
1. No.
2. Use kernel profiling (preferably high resolution kernel profiling).
Measurement will affect
Also sprach Markus Oestreicher ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Is there a way to get the real processor usage including
> the time spent on polling?
What machine do you use?
When bridging approx. 25 MB/s (so 200 MBit/s; 1 MB of traffic roughly
estimates to 1500 packets here) on a Duron 700 with ~2800 ipfw
Good Day,
One firewall I have access to uses polling(4) to forward
traffic between two fxp interfaces. (4.9-STABLE)
When forwarding at ~70 Mbps top still shows 100% idle time
as the polling(4) code runs in the system's idle process.
Is there a way to get the real processor usage including
the ti
