Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-23 Thread James
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 10:40:00PM +0200, Eivind Hestnes wrote: [ snip ] > >> > >>Debug information: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sysctl -a | grep kern.polling > >>kern.polling.burst: 150 > >>kern.polling.each_burst: 5 > >>kern.polling.burst_max: 150 > >>kern.polling.idle_poll: 0 > >>kern.polling.pol

Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-19 Thread Jon Simola
On 4/19/05, Eivind Hestnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the advice. Didn't do any difference, though.. Perhaps I > should try to increase the polling frequency.. > >>I have an Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT) NIC (em(4) driver 1.7.35) installed > >>in a Pentium III 500 Mhz with 512 MB RAM

Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-19 Thread Michael DeMan
The rule of thumb I have seen on Intel/UNIX based routers is that you want 1GHz of CPU for every gigabit of throughput. Also, on gigabit NICs, make sure you have a 64-bit PCI bus on the motherboard. Michael F. DeMan Director of Technology OpenAccess Network Services Bellingham, WA 98225 [EMAIL

Re: Performance Intel Pro 1000 MT (PWLA8490MT)

2005-04-19 Thread Eivind Hestnes
Thanks for the advice. Didn't do any difference, though.. Perhaps I should try to increase the polling frequency.. Jerald Von Dipple wrote: Hey man You need to bump kern.polling.burst: 150 Upto at least 15 Regards, Jerald Von D. On 4/19/05, Eivind Hestnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I h