On 1 Jul 2004, at 20:47, Julian Elischer wrote:
I think that nearly all languages these day shave to take into account
"what C does" and they need to have packing etc taken explicitly into
account when they do syscalls etc. so I don't think that you will have
too many problems and there should be
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2004, at 18:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >
> > are syscall arguments packed? I know that they are defined rather
> > strangely..
>
> On OpenBSD at least, they are wrapped in unions to pad them to register
> sizes.
>
> >
> > what messages
On 1 Jul 2004, at 18:20, Julian Elischer wrote:
are syscall arguments packed? I know that they are defined rather
strangely..
On OpenBSD at least, they are wrapped in unions to pad them to register
sizes.
what messages are you having troubles with?
Usually, in my experience, 'packed' structures a
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> I'm creating Netgraph bindings for OCaml in order to play around more
> easily with various Bluetooth and Ethernet things I'm working on. It's
> all pretty straightforward except for the problem that the netgraph
> message structs aren't all pac
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
AM>On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
AM>>
AM>> If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will pack/unpack
AM>> written on C,
AM>> which will be a lib for you?
AM>
AM>Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign binding
On 1 Jul 2004, at 15:10, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
We use Netgraph from within Python, using the netgraph(3) library,
and we pack/unpack various Netgraph related structs just happily.
Speaking of "struct ng_mesg", if you pack it, it will essentially
stay the same, because I believe it was created with
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will
pack/unpack written on C,
which will be a lib for you?
Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign bindings - this
would require C code for every single Ne
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 02:00:06PM +0100, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
> On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
> >
> >If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will
> >pack/unpack written on C,
> >which will be a lib for you?
>
> Because I want to minimise the size of the fore
On 1 Jul 2004, at 13:48, Roman Kurakin wrote:
If this is a problem why can't you make some wrapper that will
pack/unpack written on C,
which will be a lib for you?
Because I want to minimise the size of the foreign bindings - this
would require C code for every single Netgraph struct. If they we
Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
I'm creating Netgraph bindings for OCaml in order to play around more
easily with various Bluetooth and Ethernet things I'm working on.
It's all pretty straightforward except for the problem that the
netgraph message structs aren't all packed (e.g. struct ng_mesg).
Th
I'm creating Netgraph bindings for OCaml in order to play around more
easily with various Bluetooth and Ethernet things I'm working on. It's
all pretty straightforward except for the problem that the netgraph
message structs aren't all packed (e.g. struct ng_mesg). This means
that it's very d
11 matches
Mail list logo
