At Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:12:51 -0400,
Charles Swiger wrote:
>
> On Jul 21, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Clément Lecigne wrote:
> >> 44-pi# grep -l pcap_inject /usr/lib/libpcap*
> >> 45-pi# nm -g /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pcap.so | grep
> >> pcap_inject
> >> U pcap_inject
> >
> > Have y
At Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:17:39 +0200,
troglocan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I just read the thread. Did you take a look
> at Scapy (http://www.secdev.org/scapy). It does exactly (and more)
> what you are trying to do ...
>
> a+
>
> ps : also, Scapy6 (http://namabiiru.hongo.wide.a
Hi,
Sorry for the late reply, I just read the thread. Did you take a look
at Scapy (http://www.secdev.org/scapy). It does exactly (and more)
what you are trying to do ...
a+
ps : also, Scapy6 (http://namabiiru.hongo.wide.ad.jp/scapy6/) provides
extension of Scapy for IPv6 (some parts of what is
On Jul 21, 2006, at 1:43 PM, Clément Lecigne wrote:
44-pi# grep -l pcap_inject /usr/lib/libpcap*
45-pi# nm -g /usr/local/lib/python2.4/site-packages/pcap.so | grep
pcap_inject
U pcap_inject
Have you disable bpf support ? Which version of libpcap do you use ?
No, bpf is compiled in
Hey,
Charles Swiger wrote:
On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1]: If I could only get net/py-pcap to build, I might be able to do
a little
more... :-)
You only need net/py-pypcap, but if that's what you meant please let
me know what the build problem is.
(...)
44-pi#
On Jul 20, 2006, at 10:10 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[1]: If I could only get net/py-pcap to build, I might be able to
do a little
more... :-)
You only need net/py-pypcap, but if that's what you meant please let
me know what the build problem is.
Interesting-- basicly, your tests commonl
Okay, why not make it in C on the day 2 if not on the day 1 because u will
still want to do that on day x.?
plus the core point about constructing dirty packets is to gain understanding
of the process. i mean its very important to understand how do u form a binary
stream with a set of conseq
At Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:48:14 -0400 (EDT),
Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
>
>
> Aren't there already tools for doing this -- libnet / libdnet that both
> have py wrappers?
I looked at all those, and more, but they miss an important point.
That is, in PCS you define a packet like this (from
pcs/packets/
At Thu, 20 Jul 2006 10:40:41 -0400,
Chuck Swiger wrote:
> This strikes me as a pretty cool thing, thank you for putting the source out
> there...given a bit of free time, I'd like to at least test this, if not
> contribute. [1] :-)
Thanks :-)
> The port is missing a dependency on net/py-pcap, B
Aren't there already tools for doing this -- libnet / libdnet that both
have py wrappers?
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Hi,
:
:Sorry for the length of this email but I figured I'd get this out
:early in case there was anyone else who wanted to play with this.
:
:I have now gott
Hi--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ... ]
The Source Forge page is here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pcs
and the shar files submitted to get the ports created are now on:
http://www.freebsd.org/~gnn/pcs.port.shar
http://www.freebsd.org/~gnn/py-pypcap.shar
This strikes me as a pretty cool th
Hi,
Sorry for the length of this email but I figured I'd get this out
early in case there was anyone else who wanted to play with this.
I have now gotten out version 0.1 of the Packet Construction Set.
This is a set of Python libraries which make writing protocol testing
software much easier. Of
12 matches
Mail list logo
