Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-02-01 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 05:20:19PM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote: > A port of the whole xorp world might be a better target than just the > pim part. That wouldn't take much since it compiled easily. But it is > a whopper--nearly 1 GB required to build. XORP would be good as a separate port, but f

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-31 Thread Pavlin Radoslavov
[Note: I am not on the freebsd-net mailing list, so I am answering some of the questions after the thread was brought to my attention] * Regarding existing PIM IPv4 user-level implementations. The only IPv4 PIM implementations for UNIX I am aware of are: a) Commersial: - NextHop (http://w

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-31 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
> On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:43:12 -0600, > Bob Van Valzah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP. > I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any > user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that ker

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-30 Thread Bob Van Valzah
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 10:45, Bruce M Simpson wrote: > We don't have pimsd or pimdd for IPv4 in ports at the moment. > Patches will be gratefully accepted! I downloaded xorp-0.5 to see if I could pull pimsd from it. A quick attempt to compile just pim resulted in an error. I did succeed in compil

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-30 Thread Bob Van Valzah
I've done some local ports before and I know enough about multicast routing that I stand a chance of being able to come up with some suitable patches. I even have a good test environment for it here with Ciscos running PIM. I probably won't have time to come up with an extensive patch set, but I

Re: PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-30 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:43:12AM -0600, Bob Van Valzah wrote: > I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP. > I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any > user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that kernel support > would be pres

PIM IPv4 user-level process

2004-01-30 Thread Bob Van Valzah
I'm interested in doing IPv4 multicast routing but want to avoid DVMRP. I see kernel support for PIM both IPv4 and IPv6. But I can't find any user-level process to run PIM IPv4. It seems odd that kernel support would be present with no routing daemon. Am I missing something obvious? Th