Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Tom Judge
Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet link

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Han Hwei Woo
Just to be certain, are you aware that for PF, the last matching rule is applied? Also, you can use the command: # pfctl -vv -sr to examine how your rules are being matched. Cheers, Han Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet li

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Tom Judge
Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Tom Judge
Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as I need. (default

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Tom Judge
Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as I need. (default gw)__ Lin

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as I need. (default gw)__ Link A <---> |int A |

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Tom Judge
Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as I need. (default gw)__ Link A <---> |int A |

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Tom Judge wrote: Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as I need. (default gw)__ Link A <---> |int A | | |

Re: PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Tom Judge
Alexandre Biancalana wrote: Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as I need. (default gw)__ Link A <---> |int A | | | Link B <--

PF route-to behavior

2007-03-12 Thread Alexandre Biancalana
Hi List, I´m doing a firewall setup using 6-STABLE + PF with two internet links but I can't do the route-to rule function as I need. (default gw)__ Link A <---> |int A | | | Link B <---> |int B |