Michael Sierchio wrote:
> I use different FIBs in the ipfw ruleset to accomplish policy based
> routing, including via a tun interface.
I've just found out that even when tun0 is in fib 0, you can use it as
a gateway from a different fib, and it works:
root@km:~ # netstat -rn -4 -F1
Routing table
I use different FIBs in the ipfw ruleset to accomplish policy based
routing, including via a tun interface.
- M
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 03/30/17 09:46, Victor Sudakov wrote:
>
> Will "ipfw fwd" do the trick? I could "ipfw fwd" the packets into the
>> tun0 i
On 03/30/17 09:46, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Will "ipfw fwd" do the trick? I could "ipfw fwd" the packets into the
tun0 interface, but will OpenVPN understand that?
Never tried this, sorry.
bye
av.
___
freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
https
Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> >
> > Anyone experienced with OpenVPN on FreeBSD?
> >
> > What would be the best way to policy route a network into OpenVPN? A
> > routing decision must be based on the src IP address, not the dst IP
> > address.
> >
> > Imagine an OpenVPN client with 3 interfaces: fxp0
On 03/30/17 05:22, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Dear Colleagues,
Anyone experienced with OpenVPN on FreeBSD?
What would be the best way to policy route a network into OpenVPN? A
routing decision must be based on the src IP address, not the dst IP
address.
Imagine an OpenVPN client with 3 interfaces:
Dear Colleagues,
Anyone experienced with OpenVPN on FreeBSD?
What would be the best way to policy route a network into OpenVPN? A
routing decision must be based on the src IP address, not the dst IP
address.
Imagine an OpenVPN client with 3 interfaces: fxp0 is the outside
interface towards the O
