Suleiman Souhlal napsal(a):
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 09:51, Michal Mertl wrote:
What do you think?
Wouldn't it be better to move all the calls to badport_bandlim() to
inside icmp_error()?
It makes sense, yes. Unfortunately it isn't possible in most cases -
echo/tstamp call icmp_reflect instead o
Hi,
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 09:51, Michal Mertl wrote:
> What do you think?
Wouldn't it be better to move all the calls to badport_bandlim() to
inside icmp_error()?
Bye
--
Suleiman Souhlal| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The FreeBSD Project | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:53:07PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > I'll take care of this but I'm busy right now. Look into it later this
> > week.
>
> Thanks for looking into this, this is one of the items which came up on
> the TODO lists of three separate project
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 06:21:07PM -0800, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:53:07PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> > I'll take care of this but I'm busy right now. Look into it later this
> > week.
>
> Thanks for looking into this, this is one of the items which came up on
> t
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 03:53:07PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'll take care of this but I'm busy right now. Look into it later this week.
Thanks for looking into this, this is one of the items which came up on
the TODO lists of three separate projects (TowardEX's, XORP's, and the
Network Ju
Michal Mertl wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I think some network administrators may want to set different maximum rate
> for different types of ICMP replies. Currently the limit
> net.inet.icmp.icmplim is enforced independently for the following cases -
> ICMP echo-reply, ICMP timestamp reply, ICMP port u
Hello,
I think some network administrators may want to set different maximum rate
for different types of ICMP replies. Currently the limit
net.inet.icmp.icmplim is enforced independently for the following cases -
ICMP echo-reply, ICMP timestamp reply, ICMP port unreachable (generated as a
respo
