On 4/3/2011 9:50 AM, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
Steve,
On 01-04-11 16:50, Steve Polyack wrote:
On 04/01/11 10:16, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
[ .. ]
Mar 31 18:36:12 srv01 kernel: arp: x.x.x.1 moved from
00:00:0c:9f:f0:3d to 00:00:0c:07:ac:3d on bge0
[ .. ]
The result of that, is that loads o
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Frederique Rijsdijk
wrote:
> Hi Kip,
>
> Thanks. Any idea btw why this would also effect hosts that run 6.x and 7.x
> RELEASE versions? These do not have the flowtable sysctl.
Uhm ... no. That would definitely be unrelated. I'm just taking their
word for it. And
Hi Kip,
Thanks. Any idea btw why this would also effect hosts that run 6.x and 7.x
RELEASE versions? These do not have the flowtable sysctl.
-- Frederique
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 12:09:05PM +0200, K. Macy wrote:
> Correct. Set it to zero and the flowtable will be bypassed.
>
> flowtable.c:
Correct. Set it to zero and the flowtable will be bypassed.
flowtable.c:
static uint32_t
ipv6_flow_lookup_hash_internal(
struct sockaddr_in6 *ssin6, struct sockaddr_in6 *dsin6,
uint32_t *key, uint16_t flags)
{
uint16_t sport, dport;
uint8_t proto;
int of
Kip,
Which sysctl are we talking about exactly? Just to be sure..
net.inet.flowtable.enable ?
-- Frederique
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 08:11:33PM +0200, K. Macy wrote:
> I don't think it was properly tested when it was enabled for IPv6.
> Given that I have been absentee it really should not be
I don't think it was properly tested when it was enabled for IPv6.
Given that I have been absentee it really should not be in the default
kernel or at least the sysctl should be off. Sorry for the
inconvenience. Additionally, you don't need to rebuild you can just
disable the sysctl.
-Kip
On Sun
Steve,
On 01-04-11 16:50, Steve Polyack wrote:
> On 04/01/11 10:16, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
[ .. ]
>> Mar 31 18:36:12 srv01 kernel: arp: x.x.x.1 moved from
>> 00:00:0c:9f:f0:3d to 00:00:0c:07:ac:3d on bge0
[ .. ]
>> The result of that, is that loads of FreeBSD machines (6.x, 7.x and
>> 8.x) dev
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:50 AM, Steve Polyack wrote:
> On 04/01/11 10:16, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> We (hosting provider) are in the process of implementing ipv6 in our
>> network (yay). Yesterday one of the final steps in configuring and updating
>> our core routers were taken, w
On 04/01/11 10:16, Frederique Rijsdijk wrote:
Hi,
We (hosting provider) are in the process of implementing ipv6 in our network
(yay). Yesterday one of the final steps in configuring and updating our core
routers were taken, which did not go entirely as planned. As a result, the
default gatewa
Hi,
We (hosting provider) are in the process of implementing ipv6 in our network
(yay). Yesterday one of the final steps in configuring and updating our core
routers were taken, which did not go entirely as planned. As a result, the
default gateway mac addresses for all our machines changed abo
10 matches
Mail list logo
