On Sun, 17 Feb 2008, Kip Macy wrote:
Hi,
You might want to check out sys/modules/cxgb/tom/Makefile.
ha, so that file is not compiled at all. Thanks for pointing this out.
Is there a reason to keep it in cvs then? I guess there is but it's
not obvious to me;-)
So basically what does that mean
You might want to check out sys/modules/cxgb/tom/Makefile.
-Kip
On Feb 17, 2008 1:24 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> [cutting a long mail short and randomly replying;-)]
>
> I came across dev/cxgb/ulp/tom/cxgb_tcp_subr.c vs. ne
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Robert Watson wrote:
Hi,
[cutting a long mail short and randomly replying;-)]
I came across dev/cxgb/ulp/tom/cxgb_tcp_subr.c vs. netinet/tcp_subr.c
and I am a bit worried with the way things are done atm. For those
functions copied over there are only changes like:
-
At Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:47:24 + (GMT),
rwatson wrote:
>
>
> There's also the opportunity to think about whether it's possible to
> harden things in such a ways as to not give up our flexibility to
> keep maintaining and improving TCP (and other related subsystems),
> yet improving the quality o
On Jan 10, 2008 2:50 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Sun, 6 Jan 2008 13:47:24 + (GMT),
> rwatson wrote:
> >
> >
> > There's also the opportunity to think about whether it's possible to
> > harden things in such a ways as to not give up our flexibility to
> > keep maintaining and improving
On Jan 6, 2008 5:47 AM, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> My proposal, and this is really a proposal to drive discussion as much as a
> proposal for a policy, is that the internal TCP data structures exported via
> the TOE interfaces and accessed by TOE device drivers *not* be conside
On Sun, 6 Jan 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
There's also the opportunity to think about whether it's possible to harden
things in such a ways as to not give up our flexibility to keep maintaining
and improving TCP (and other related subsystems), yet improving the quality
of life for a third pa
Robert Watson wrote:
There's also the opportunity to think about whether it's possible to
harden things in such a ways as to not give up our flexibility to keep
maintaining and improving TCP (and other related subsystems), yet
improving the quality of life for a third party TOE driver maint
Dear all,
Last month, Kip Macy committed support for TCP offload to the FreeBSD CVS
repository for the Chelsio 10gbps device driver. We've had interest from
other vendors in supporting TOE on FreeBSD, although it remains unclear as yet
which will end up supporting it. This e-mail is about h
