Re: Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-18 Thread Steve Tremblett
+ Archie Cobbs wrote: | Are you intending to have this hook into the normal FreeBSD TCP/IP | stack or be truly standalone? I read your question as the latter but | others seem to read it as the former. I am very much a babe in the woods at this point. I have no plan aside from reading as much

Re: Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-17 Thread Archie Cobbs
Steve Tremblett writes: > A while back someone was fishing for a project to take on and someone > suggested a complete TCP/IP implementation in netgraph. I found the > idea interesting and am considering taking a shot at it. My main goal > in all this is to learn as much as possible and at this p

Re: Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Julian Elischer wrote: > > There is also the m_pullup() issue of the TCP protocol that is > > being passed IP datagrams which may be frags of TCP packets, in > > order to get the full TCP header, with options. > > The tcp code should handle this anyway. It should, but it won't. The issue is when

Re: Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-17 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Vincent Jardin wrote: > > I do not think that you need a raw IP netgraph node. Something similar > > already exists. Why not use the ng_ksocket in order to open a raw IP socket > > under your TCP node ? > > Because the packet will never get to your pr

Re: Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Vincent Jardin wrote: > I do not think that you need a raw IP netgraph node. Something similar > already exists. Why not use the ng_ksocket in order to open a raw IP socket > under your TCP node ? Because the packet will never get to your protocol processing, unless you turn of standard TCP altoge

Re: Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-17 Thread Vincent Jardin
I do not think that you need a raw IP netgraph node. Something similar already exists. Why not use the ng_ksocket in order to open a raw IP socket under your TCP node ? Vincent Le Jeudi 17 Octobre 2002 20:59, vous avez écrit : > Steve Tremblett wrote: > > A while back someone was fishing for a

Re: Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-17 Thread Terry Lambert
Steve Tremblett wrote: > A while back someone was fishing for a project to take on and someone > suggested a complete TCP/IP implementation in netgraph. I found the > idea interesting and am considering taking a shot at it. My main goal > in all this is to learn as much as possible and at this po

Netgraph TCP/IP

2002-10-17 Thread Steve Tremblett
A while back someone was fishing for a project to take on and someone suggested a complete TCP/IP implementation in netgraph. I found the idea interesting and am considering taking a shot at it. My main goal in all this is to learn as much as possible and at this point I'm just reading. While th