Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-03-16 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 16.03.2011 19:21, Mike Tancsa wrote: > A new one it seems. On the console, I have one with full crashdump too. Crashdump and other files are available on request. GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public Lice

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-03-01 Thread Eugene Grosbein
Something new in my logs yesterday: Mar 1 16:06:38 k-45-pc-1 kernel: Accessing freed node node: ID [2e5c7a]: type 'tee', 0 hooks, flags 0x9, 0 refs, mpd11699-vlan373-781-lt: Mar 1 16:06:38 k-45-pc-1 kernel: Last active @ /home/src/sys/netgraph/ng_base.c, line 2257 Mar 1 16:06:38 k-45-pc-1 ker

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-02-16 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> On 14.01.2011 18:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I also have very loaded mpd/PPPoE servers that panic all the time: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/153255 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/153671 I've just got yet another panic on mpd5 box after about 30 days of upt

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-02-16 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 03:04:09PM +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote: E> On 16.02.2011 14:46, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: E> > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:13:59AM +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote: E> > E> I run AMD64 with 4GB of memory, lots of memory is free and E> > E> I still get panics often, sometimes two in a

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-02-16 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 16.02.2011 14:46, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:13:59AM +0600, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > E> I run AMD64 with 4GB of memory, lots of memory is free and > E> I still get panics often, sometimes two in a couple of hours. > E> It does not seem memory exhaustion to me. It seems as

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/31/2011 12:10 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 1/31/11 8:58 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> On 1/31/11 7:13 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: And in this one, can you please show *hook->hk_peer ? >>> (kgdb) print *hook->hk_peer >>> $2 = { >>>hk_name = "\b\000\000\000 >>> \000\000\000\004\00

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/31/11 8:58 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 1/31/11 7:13 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: And in this one, can you please show *hook->hk_peer ? (kgdb) print *hook->hk_peer $2 = { hk_name = "\b\000\000\000 \000\000\000\004\000\000\000\001\000\000\000ŐRí\003\003ö\0248cmd4\000\000\000", hk_p

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/31/11 7:13 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: And in this one, can you please show *hook->hk_peer ? (kgdb) print *hook->hk_peer $2 = { hk_name = "\b\000\000\000 \000\000\000\004\000\000\000\001\000\000\000ŐRí\003\003ö\0248cmd4\000\000\000", hk_private = 0x0, hk_flags = 0, hk_refs = 0, hk_

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> And in this one, can you please show *hook->hk_peer ? (kgdb) print *hook->hk_peer $2 = { hk_name = "\b\000\000\000 \000\000\000\004\000\000\000\001\000\000\000ŐRí\003\003ö\0248cmd4\000\000\000", hk_private = 0x0, hk_flags = 0, hk_refs = 0, hk_type = 0, hk_peer = 0x0, hk_node = 0x0, hk_hooks

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> (kgdb) print *ng_name_hash[116].lh_first It looks like this one is corrupted: (kgdb) print *ng_name_hash[116].lh_first.nd_nodes.le_next.nd_nodes.le_next.nd_nodes.le_next.nd_nodes.le_next $19 = {nd_name = "ng258", '\0' , nd_type = 0xc61871a0, nd_flags = 0, nd_refs = 1, nd_numhooks = 0, nd_priv

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 02:40:55PM +0100, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: P> > In this dump, can we seek for where did 0x74 came from? Can you look at P> > ng_name_hash[hash]? P> P> (kgdb) print hash P> No symbol "hash" in current context. P> (kgdb) info all P> eax0xff9a -102 P> e

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
> In this dump, can we seek for where did 0x74 came from? Can you look at > ng_name_hash[hash]? (kgdb) print hash No symbol "hash" in current context. (kgdb) info all eax0xff9a -102 ecx0xe7ce6895 -405903211 edx0xff9a -102 ebx

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-31 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:05:31AM +0100, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: P> Hello, P> P> I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE P> concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms and P> runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. P> P> I'm experiencing sta

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-18 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/17/2011 11:14 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 17.01.2011 17:41, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I also have stability issues on RELENG_8. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153497 >>> >>> Do you change net.isr.direct from default 1 to 0 for your box? >> >> No, I leave it at 1 >> >

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-17 Thread Mike Tancsa
Thanks, I will give those values a try! ---Mike On 1/17/2011 11:14 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 17.01.2011 17:41, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I also have stability issues on RELENG_8. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153497 >>> >>> Do you change net.isr.direc

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 17.01.2011 17:41, Mike Tancsa wrote: >>> I also have stability issues on RELENG_8. >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153497 >> >> Do you change net.isr.direct from default 1 to 0 for your box? > > No, I leave it at 1 > > ---Mike I was experiencing some instability with

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-17 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/17/2011 5:48 AM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 14.01.2011 18:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: > >> I also have stability issues on RELENG_8. >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153497 > > Do you change net.isr.direct from default 1 to 0 for your box? No, I leave it at 1 ---Mike >

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-17 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 14.01.2011 18:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: > I also have stability issues on RELENG_8. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=153497 Do you change net.isr.direct from default 1 to 0 for your box? ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lis

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-14 Thread Eugene Grosbein
On 14.01.2011 18:46, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE >> concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms >> and >> runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. >> >> I'm experiencing stability issues related to Netgraph. None

Re: Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-14 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 1/14/2011 4:05 AM, Przemyslaw Frasunek wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE > concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms > and > runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. > > I'm experiencing stability issues related to

Netgraph/mpd5 stability issues

2011-01-14 Thread Przemyslaw Frasunek
Hello, I'm using mpd 5.5 on three PPPoE routers, each servicing about 300 PPPoE concurrent sessions. Routers are based on Intel SR1630GP hardware platforms and runs FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE. I'm experiencing stability issues related to Netgraph. None of above routers can survive more than 20-30 days o