Re: NATT patch on current

2009-01-16 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
Hi. The netipsec.c patch should not have been present, it has probably been generated either by a manipulation error from myself or by some race condition between a svn up and a svn diff to produce the patch. Please test the following patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/patch-natt-test-

Re: NATT patch on current

2009-01-10 Thread Giulio Ferro
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi. On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:40:53AM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote: I just wanted to report that the nat-traversal patch on HEAD 2008-03-19 fails to apply cleanly. The problem is in the file ipsec.c lines 1847, 1870 Any news for the natt integration in CURRENT?

Re: NATT patch on current

2009-01-10 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: Hi, On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:40:53AM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote: I just wanted to report that the nat-traversal patch on HEAD 2008-03-19 fails to apply cleanly. The problem is in the file ipsec.c lines 1847, 1870 Any news for the natt integration

Re: NATT patch on current

2009-01-10 Thread VANHULLEBUS Yvan
Hi. On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:40:53AM +0100, Giulio Ferro wrote: > I just wanted to report that the nat-traversal patch on HEAD 2008-03-19 > fails to apply cleanly. > The problem is in the file ipsec.c lines 1847, 1870 > > Any news for the natt integration in CURRENT? Thanks for the report. I'm

NATT patch on current

2009-01-10 Thread Giulio Ferro
I just wanted to report that the nat-traversal patch on HEAD 2008-03-19 fails to apply cleanly. The problem is in the file ipsec.c lines 1847, 1870 Any news for the natt integration in CURRENT? Thanks. ___ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://li