Bump
Has anyone else reviewed this code? I have looked it over but not run it.
Visually it looks fine to me.
Best,
George
On Sep 4, 2013, at 4:04 , Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is 2nd version of multiqueue bpf patch, I think I fixed things what
> you commented on previous mail.
> Her
Hi,
This is 2nd version of multiqueue bpf patch, I think I fixed things what
you commented on previous mail.
Here's a change list of the patch:
- Drop added functions on struct
ifnet(if_get_[rt]xqueue_len/if_get_[rt]xqueue_affinity).
HW queue number and queue affinity informations are maybe usefu
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have an updated URL for the diffs ? The link below from your
>> original message
>> seems not working now (NXDOMAIN)
>>
>> http://www.dokukino.com/mq_bpf_20110813.diff
>>
>
> Changes with recent head is on my repository:
> http
Hi,
Do you have an updated URL for the diffs ? The link below from your
> original message
> seems not working now (NXDOMAIN)
>
> http://www.dokukino.com/mq_bpf_20110813.diff
>
Changes with recent head is on my repository:
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/user/syuu/mq_bpf/
And I attached a diff fil
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose multiqueue support for bpf.
> It's result of GSoC'11, and proposed on freebsd-net at Aug.2011 but not yet
> merged:
>
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/revi
Hi all,
I'd like to propose multiqueue support for bpf.
It's result of GSoC'11, and proposed on freebsd-net at Aug.2011 but not yet
merged:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/syuu1228/1
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-August/0
Hi,
Probably my previous mail had been skipped or forgot replying, so I'd
like to try notice again.
# This is original post of this thread, if you don't remember what is
this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2011-August/029585.html
George said "I think we should try to integrate th
Sorry for late replying,
> One comment, one question.
>
> First, I think we should try to integrate this work and then tune it up more.
> The API
> is, I think, fine, and performance tuning takes a bit of work.
Is there good way(I mean tools or something) to find the bottleneck?
> Second, what
On Aug 19, 2011, at 04:21 , Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Any comments or suggestions?
>
>
One comment, one question.
First, I think we should try to integrate this work and then tune it up more.
The API
is, I think, fine, and performance tuning takes a bit of work.
Second, what are the parameters
Any comments or suggestions?
2011/8/18 Takuya ASADA :
> 2011/8/16 Vlad Galu :
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
>>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I implemented multiqueue support f
2011/8/16 Vlad Galu :
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
>> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
>>> This is a Google Summer o
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:50 AM, Vlad Galu wrote:
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
>> This is a Google Summer of Code project, the project goal is to
>>
On Aug 16, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Takuya ASADA wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
> This is a Google Summer of Code project, the project goal is to
> support multiqueue network interface on BPF, and provide interfaces
Hi all,
I implemented multiqueue support for bpf, I'd like to present for review.
This is a Google Summer of Code project, the project goal is to
support multiqueue network interface on BPF, and provide interfaces
for multithreaded packet processing using BPF.
Modern high performance NICs
14 matches
Mail list logo
